The overloadable attribute is sensitive to the syntactic position of the attribute #53805
Description
Consider:
__attribute__((overloadable)) void func_bad(...); // error
void func_good(...) __attribute__((overloadable)); // okay
[[clang::overloadable]] void func_also_bad(...); // error
void func_also_bad_again(...) [[clang::overloadable]]; // error, this is the only diagnostic that makes sense to me
void okay_now_Im_just_baffled [[clang::overloadable]](...); // okay
The only diagnostic that makes sense (to me) is the one on func_also_bad_again() due to it being written in the type position and not being a type attribute.
https://godbolt.org/z/7qWjWdbGP is a live example. I think the two cases labeled error with no other comments should also be accepted.