Skip to content

Lerna is largely unmaintained #2703

@MikeActually

Description

@MikeActually

Historically speaking, Lerna has had issue with consistent maintainers, even though it is very widely used. (800K+ weekly downloads from NPM - https://www.npmjs.com/package/lerna)

What are the longterm options for this package?

Can ownership be more formalized and support be? For example, I see that Stackstorm (https://stackstorm.com/) depends on this library pretty extensively. Can they take on ownership of maintaining this?

Do additional owners need to be added to the NPM package?

What is the best way to handle contributions and support, if no owners can be found? How can contributions be encouraged?

What happens to the Twitter account and website?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions