Can you not use with-current-project inside this command?

symbol-call doesn't work with macros, and peek-legit is defined before legit so I can't import it directly. Is there another way?

so, mmh, we can surely move the macro definition in peek-legit or in a common file. I'm annoyed to see call-with-current-project being exported and this lambda.

you ok to give it a try?

Sure, I just used symbol-call cause I saw it being used elsewhere in peek-legit, I'll try to find somewhere to move it

let's say: if this is non trivial, if doing this pulls too many strings, we can do it later. If you find a quick solution, great.

I look at these symbol-call and I wonder if we really need this separation of packages.

Works fine in porcelain, also kinda makes sense for it to be there. Do you prefer if I replace the calls with lem/porcelain:with-current-project or should I just use import-from?
Edit: went ahead and moved it with the explicit call.

The use of symbol-call seems to me to be a sign of poor design.
It is also vulnerable to refactoring, which increases the possibility that changes on the lem side will break the legit.

@cxxxr ye we're moving away from it, don't worry

great, thank you!