Skip to content

[Merged by Bors] - feat(CategoryTheory): naturality of the connecting homomorphism of the snake lemma#8490

Closed
joelriou wants to merge 7 commits intomasterfrom
snake-naturality
Closed

[Merged by Bors] - feat(CategoryTheory): naturality of the connecting homomorphism of the snake lemma#8490
joelriou wants to merge 7 commits intomasterfrom
snake-naturality

Conversation

@joelriou
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@joelriou joelriou commented Nov 18, 2023

In this PR, it is shown that the connecting homomorphism of the snake lemma is natural.


Open in Gitpod

@ghost ghost added the blocked-by-other-PR This PR depends on another PR (this label is automatically managed by a bot) label Nov 18, 2023
@ghost ghost removed the blocked-by-other-PR This PR depends on another PR (this label is automatically managed by a bot) label Nov 24, 2023
@ghost
Copy link
Copy Markdown

ghost commented Nov 24, 2023

This PR/issue depends on:

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jcommelin jcommelin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks 🎉

bors merge

Comment on lines +32 to +36
`L₀.X₁ ⟶ L₀.X₂ ⟶ L₀.X₃ ⟶ L₃.X₁ ⟶ L₃.X₂ ⟶ L₃.X₃`. Each of the four exactness
statement is first stated separately as lemmas `L₀_exact`, `L₁'_exact`,
`L₂'_exact` and `L₃_exact` and the full 6-term exact sequence is stated
as `snake_lemma`. This sequence can even be extended with an extra `0`
on the left (see `mono_L₀_f`) if `L₁.X₁ ⟶ L₁.X₂` is a mono (i.e. `L₁` is short exact),
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
`L₀.X₁ ⟶ L₀.X₂ ⟶ L₀.X₃ ⟶ L₃.X₁ ⟶ L₃.X₂ ⟶ L₃.X₃`. Each of the four exactness
statement is first stated separately as lemmas `L₀_exact`, `L₁'_exact`,
`L₂'_exact` and `L₃_exact` and the full 6-term exact sequence is stated
as `snake_lemma`. This sequence can even be extended with an extra `0`
on the left (see `mono_L₀_f`) if `L₁.X₁ ⟶ L₁.X₂` is a mono (i.e. `L₁` is short exact),
`L₀.X₁ ⟶ L₀.X₂ ⟶ L₀.X₃ ⟶ L₃.X₁ ⟶ L₃.X₂ ⟶ L₃.X₃`. Each of the four exactness
statements is first stated separately as lemma `L₀_exact`, `L₁'_exact`,
`L₂'_exact` and `L₃_exact` and the full 6-term exact sequence is stated
as `snake_lemma`. This sequence can even be extended with an extra `0`
on the left (see `mono_L₀_f`) if `L₁.X₁ ⟶ L₁.X₂` is a mono (i.e. `L₁` is short exact),

@ghost ghost added ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors. and removed awaiting-review labels Nov 28, 2023
mathlib-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2023
…e snake lemma (#8490)

In this PR, it is shown that the connecting homomorphism of the snake lemma is natural.
@mathlib-bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mathlib-bors bot commented Nov 28, 2023

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot changed the title feat(CategoryTheory): naturality of the connecting homomorphism of the snake lemma [Merged by Bors] - feat(CategoryTheory): naturality of the connecting homomorphism of the snake lemma Nov 28, 2023
@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot closed this Nov 28, 2023
@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot deleted the snake-naturality branch November 28, 2023 15:31
awueth pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2023
…e snake lemma (#8490)

In this PR, it is shown that the connecting homomorphism of the snake lemma is natural.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors. t-category-theory Category theory

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants