feat(Distribution): make parameters implicit in favor of type ascription#37479
Open
ADedecker wants to merge 1 commit intoleanprover-community:masterfrom
Open
feat(Distribution): make parameters implicit in favor of type ascription#37479ADedecker wants to merge 1 commit intoleanprover-community:masterfrom
ADedecker wants to merge 1 commit intoleanprover-community:masterfrom
Conversation
PR summary 18a09f9093Import changes for modified filesNo significant changes to the import graph Import changes for all files
Declarations diffNo declarations were harmed in the making of this PR! 🐙 You can run this locally as follows## summary with just the declaration names:
./scripts/pr_summary/declarations_diff.sh <optional_commit>
## more verbose report:
./scripts/pr_summary/declarations_diff.sh long <optional_commit>The doc-module for No changes to technical debt.You can run this locally as
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Expanding on a suggestion by @faenuccio in an earlier PR, I make the regularity parameters of TestFunction.fderivCLM (and similar constructions) implicit.
This is a bit controversial, because it is essentially forcing type ascription in a lot of contexts. The rationale is that
"the differentiation operator from
𝓓^{n}to𝓓^{k}" matches mathematical practice, and is easier to parse than "the differentiation operator with parametersnandk".To make this even more convenient, I introduce notations like
𝓓^{n}to be used when the spaces can be inferred but the regularity cannot.