[Merged by Bors] - feat(Analysis/Complex/UpperHalfPlane): SL(2, R) action is proper#36895
[Merged by Bors] - feat(Analysis/Complex/UpperHalfPlane): SL(2, R) action is proper#36895loefflerd wants to merge 30 commits intoleanprover-community:masterfrom
Conversation
PR summary 1c98d2c008Import changes for modified filesNo significant changes to the import graph Import changes for all files
|
|
This PR seems to be cursed: whatever I do I get random CI failures. I'm just going to leave it be for now, and hope the bugs are gone once the upstream PR's it depends on are merged. |
|
This pull request has conflicts, please merge |
|
This PR/issue depends on: |
j-loreaux
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This looks very nice. My only complaint, and it is not a complaint against you, is that fun_prop can't be used to tackle these continuity goals. That makes me very sad. One problem at least is that it can't make use of Continuous.matrix_elem. I don't see an easy way to solve this.
bors d+
|
✌️ loefflerd can now approve this pull request. To approve and merge a pull request, simply reply with |
Co-authored-by: Jireh Loreaux <[email protected]>
|
Thanks Jireh for the review! I filed an issue, just so your comment doesn't get forgotten (about bors r+ |
|
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
…nprover-community#36895) Show that the actions of `SL(2, ℝ)` and `GL(2, ℝ)` on the upper half-plane are continuous in both variables, and the action of `SL(2, ℝ)` is proper.
…nprover-community#36895) Show that the actions of `SL(2, ℝ)` and `GL(2, ℝ)` on the upper half-plane are continuous in both variables, and the action of `SL(2, ℝ)` is proper.
Show that the actions of
SL(2, ℝ)andGL(2, ℝ)on the upper half-plane are continuous in both variables, and the action ofSL(2, ℝ)is proper.