feat: localizations of primes in Dedekind domains are valuation subrings#33010
feat: localizations of primes in Dedekind domains are valuation subrings#33010xgenereux wants to merge 9 commits intoleanprover-community:masterfrom
Conversation
PR summary 34f85c5f24Import changes for modified filesNo significant changes to the import graph Import changes for all files
|
|
have now renamed to use |
|
|
||
| /-- Given `v : HeightOneSpectrum R`, the valuation associated to `v` has the localization of | ||
| `R` at `v` as valuation subring. -/ | ||
| theorem valuationSubringAtPrime_eq_valuationSubring : |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you mention this in the docstring of valuationSubringAtPrime_eq_valuationSubring? Thanks.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's been a while, what do you remember what you meant?
|
The code of this PR will get simplified if we have #33634, so I will wait for that. |
647945d to
9b44589
Compare
|
I'll wait for the dependent PRs to see if the error goes away. |
bc91bd8 to
19b3452
Compare
|
This PR/issue depends on: |
76a1551 to
76efd7d
Compare
The goal of this PR is the theorem
valuationSubringAtPrime_eq_valuationSubringwhich states that the localization at a nonzero prime in a Dedekind domain is precisely the valuation subring of the valuation associated with that same prime.Given a Dedekind domain
Rin its field of fractionsK, we defineIsDedekindDomain.valuationSubringAtPrime, which is the localization ofRat a nonzero prime, viewed as valuation subring ofK.We show that
valuationSubringAtPrime K v ≤ (valuation K v).valuationSubringand use maximality to show that they must be equal.Other small note:
intValuation_exists_uniformizerin terms ofvaluation(instead of intValuation).Co-authored-by: María Inés de Frutos Fernández <[email protected]>