Added model "LearningLIFFloat" to make API hardware agnostic. #535
Merged
Added model "LearningLIFFloat" to make API hardware agnostic. #535
Conversation
gkarray
approved these changes
Dec 9, 2022
Contributor
gkarray
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As discussed in a previous meeting, all good!
bala-git9
approved these changes
Dec 9, 2022
monkin77
pushed a commit
to monkin77/thesis-lava
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 12, 2024
…c#535) * add learning lif float and tests * lint
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue Number:
Objective of pull request:
As we introduced a LearningLIF Process, we also need one for floating point simulations. This PR adds that and also adds a test for it.
Pull request checklist
Your PR fulfills the following requirements:
flakeheaven lint src/lava tests/) and (bandit -r src/lava/.) pass locallypytest) passes locallyPull request type
Please check your PR type:
What is the current behavior?
What is the new behavior?
Does this introduce a breaking change?
Supplemental information