feat: regenerate requirement.txt - #720
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces automatic requirements.txt generation for Python plugins by leveraging uv export when a uv.lock file is present. The packaging logic was refactored to support this, including updates to the Python template and the addition of a Root method to the filesystem decoder. Feedback focused on improving the robustness of the external command execution by adding timeouts via exec.CommandContext and enhancing error reporting for cases where the uv command fails without stderr output.
Stream29
approved these changes
Apr 29, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
fix #719
Type of Change
Essential Checklist
Testing
Bug Fix (if applicable)
Fixes #123orCloses #123)Additional Information
Please provide any additional context that would help reviewers understand the changes.