conformance: make backend TLS tests IPv6-safe #4120
Conversation
otherwise we send requests to `http://[fc00/backendtlspolicy-nonexistent-ca-certificate-ref"` which is very wrong
k8s-ci-robot
added
release-note-none
k8s-ci-robot
added
approved
|
Thanks @howardjohn! /lgtm |
|
@robscott: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
lgtm
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: howardjohn, robscott The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
@robscott: new pull request created: #4121 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
otherwise we send requests to `http://[fc00/backendtlspolicy-nonexistent-ca-certificate-ref"` which is very wrong
4 participants
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
/area conformance-test
What this PR does / why we need it:
otherwise we send requests to
http://[fc00/backendtlspolicy-nonexistent-ca-certificate-ref"which is very wrongWhich issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: