Add crictl update --oom-score-adj flag#1781
Conversation
We have not used the value for the container update since now, which is now being added for feature completeness. Signed-off-by: Sascha Grunert <[email protected]>
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: saschagrunert The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
Is it a revert of of #279? |
Oh, yes. I'm wondering why we should not have flags for mainly all available runtime update fields. There are also others missing: There are also other runtimes like crun and youki. 🤔 |
I am not sure what is the right way to do here. Did you want it for completeness? Or some scenario is missing? |
|
From perspective of Node Resource Hot Plug KEP, where we are planning to utilize |
/lgtm I guess we will be ok to return error if not supported on some runtimes |
Yeah, Thank you. |
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
What this PR does / why we need it:
We have not used the value for the container update since now, which is now being added for feature completeness.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
None
Special notes for your reviewer:
@kubernetes-sigs/cri-tools-maintainers
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?