feat: Add flagz endpoint for kube-scheduler#128818
feat: Add flagz endpoint for kube-scheduler#128818k8s-ci-robot merged 2 commits intokubernetes:masterfrom
Conversation
|
This issue is currently awaiting triage. If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the The DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/ok-to-test |
4b69d51 to
aeeda59
Compare
aeeda59 to
b4a371b
Compare
|
/lgtm |
|
LGTM label has been added. DetailsGit tree hash: 4cdfbd47b7350baa0023d623d9f4a21a9387f6d6 |
|
/assign dom4ha |
kerthcet
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We need a test to make sure flagz works, see similar ones here: test/integration/scheduler/serving/healthcheck_test.go
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| const ( | ||
| kubeScheduler = "kube-scheduler" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you replace L94 with this variable, other places as well. Thanks.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For line 94, I prefer to let it explicitly show the command usage. I've updated the rest of places.
We need one more test to make sure it works. @yongruilin Thanks |
0aaf747 to
cda5b36
Compare
cda5b36 to
baff2d7
Compare
6ee4bbf to
1236c36
Compare
|
/retest |
1236c36 to
db6bf02
Compare
|
/retest |
|
/lgtm |
|
LGTM label has been added. DetailsGit tree hash: 170f30de9ea141fb49c65b97da7c6f48b3dfe5c4 |
|
/lgtm |
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: kerthcet, richabanker, yongruilin The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
What this PR does / why we need it:
Adds a /flagz endpoint for kube-scheduler
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #128816 and kubernetes/enhancements#4828
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:
Example response