Skip to content

Conversation

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

Exploring termination revealed we have race conditions in certain
parts of pod initialization and termination. To better catch these
issues refactor the existing test so it can be reused, and then test
a number of alternate scenarios.

Tests issues found in #102344

/hold

As I want to add more tests before merge.

What type of PR is this?

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?


Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Jun 23, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/test sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. and removed do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Jun 23, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from mrunalp and mtaufen June 23, 2021 20:29
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: smarterclayton

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 23, 2021
Copy link
Member

@ehashman ehashman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/kind cleanup
/priority important-soon
/triage accepted
/release-note-none

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on. and removed do-not-merge/needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Jun 23, 2021
@SergeyKanzhelev
Copy link
Member

/release-note-none

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. and removed do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. labels Jun 30, 2021
@SergeyKanzhelev
Copy link
Member

@smarterclayton is it ready to be looked at?

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test all

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 9, 2021
Exploring termination revealed we have race conditions in certain
parts of pod initialization and termination. To better catch these
issues refactor the existing test so it can be reused, and then test
a number of alternate scenarios.
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 9, 2021
@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold cancel

remove commit with more iterations since this passed

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 14, 2021
@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@ehashman
Copy link
Member

ehashman commented Aug 4, 2021

/hold

to prevent accidental merging

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 4, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@smarterclayton: PR needs rebase.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 5, 2021
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Mark this issue or PR as rotten with /lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 3, 2022
@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Jan 14, 2022

this PR has been on hold for about 2 weeks. Can you please see how to unblock this by reviewing comments etc? or please close this out (Trying to declutter our open list of PRs)

@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Feb 11, 2022

This PR is older than 4 weeks and needs as rebase.

Please rebase the PR against latest master and reopen if still needed.

/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@dims: Closed this PR.

Details

In response to this:

This PR is older than 4 weeks and needs as rebase.

Please rebase the PR against latest master and reopen if still needed.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/test cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants