Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 22, 2022. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@aliok
Copy link
Member

@aliok aliok commented Jan 10, 2020

Fixes #68

@knative-prow-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @aliok. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a knative member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@aliok
Copy link
Member Author

aliok commented Jan 10, 2020

cc @houshengbo @k4leung4

@aliok aliok changed the title Have OLM metadata in source repo for reference #68 Have OLM metadata in source repo for reference Jan 10, 2020
@matzew
Copy link
Member

matzew commented Jan 10, 2020

/ok-to-test

keywords:
- serverless
- eventing
- camel
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

there is no camel, nor kafka

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1, let me get rid of those here and also in operatorHub

plural: eventings
singular: eventing
shortNames:
- ke
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we really need this shortname ? /cc @cardil

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hmm, I started this PR before the shortname discussion. What's the latest situation there ? 🤣

Copy link
Contributor

@cardil cardil Jan 10, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Short names should be removed, upstream already merged #48

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link

@houshengbo houshengbo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
Thanks to @aliok for working on the operator submission to operatorhub.
In future releases, we get rid of the short names.

@knative-prow-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: aliok, houshengbo

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot merged commit 09e72cb into knative:master Jan 13, 2020
@aliok aliok deleted the #68-olm-metadata branch January 15, 2020 07:01
@aliok
Copy link
Member Author

aliok commented Jan 15, 2020

Created operator-framework/community-operators#1108 for fixing the metadata in OperatorHub

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Have OLM metadata in source repo for reference

5 participants