Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 22, 2022. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@cardil
Copy link
Contributor

@cardil cardil commented Dec 11, 2019

This PR renames eventing CR to be named KnativeEventing and be aligned with knative serving.

This is inline with Operation WG decision made on meeting of Dec 10th and should address #18

@knative-prow-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @cardil. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a knative member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@matzew
Copy link
Member

matzew commented Dec 11, 2019

/ok-to-test

@matzew
Copy link
Member

matzew commented Dec 11, 2019

/hold

let's not merge YET

@cardil cardil changed the title Bugfix: Revert CR kind to KnativeEventing Bugfix: Rename CR kind to KnativeEventing Dec 11, 2019
@matzew
Copy link
Member

matzew commented Dec 11, 2019

We should merge this after we cut for 0.11 - right ?

Currently we have no such branch:
https://github.com/knative/eventing-operator/tree/v0.11.0

@cardil
Copy link
Contributor Author

cardil commented Dec 11, 2019

We should merge this after we cut for 0.11 - right ?

Exactly. This should be for 0.12+

Plus a lint fix for README.md
@n3wscott
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/approve

When the 0.11 cuts, we can let the hold off

plural: knativeeventings
singular: knativeeventing
shortNames:
- ke

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am now really leaning on to removing this short name. For example, if we have older version of knative eventing operator installed, this short name is occupied by the CRD eventings.operator.knative.dev. After we applying the new CRD knativeeventings.operator.knative.dev also with this same short name, the terrible thing will happen: none of the old or the new CR can be found by the operator controller. If we remove this short name or change it to something else, this issue is gone. @cardil @n3wscott

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's a valid concern for me. I'm okay with removing it.

@matzew
Copy link
Member

matzew commented Dec 18, 2019

@cardil so, we have https://github.com/knative/eventing-operator/tree/v0.11.0 as the release for 0.11 was cut.

wanna move forward here, cancel the HOLD ?

There's a problem, that if we have older version of knative
eventing operator installed, this short name is occupied by
the CRD eventings.operator.knative.dev. After we applying
the new CRD knativeeventings.operator.knative.dev also with
this same short name, the terrible thing will happen: none
of the old or the new CR can be found by the operator
controller.

Typically you won't deal with those resources on a daily
basis, occupying a 2-letter slot seems to be intrusive
and not really justified.

Taking above to account, removing that short name seams
most reasonable.
@cardil
Copy link
Contributor Author

cardil commented Dec 18, 2019

@matzew Please cancel the hold. Also, waiting for lgtm after additional remove of short name.

@matzew
Copy link
Member

matzew commented Dec 19, 2019

/hold cancel

Copy link
Member

@matzew matzew left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@knative-prow-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cardil, matzew, n3wscott

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants