Skip to content

Clarify project status #616

@prymitive

Description

@prymitive

Are you still trying to get this library changes merged upstream? I found an old ticket - #3 - but that's a few years now.
I found this library to offer a decent CPU savings (31 -> 30 cpu cores on a busy server) when using it in Prometheus - prometheus/prometheus#10782, so I wanted to propose using it there by default.
But this opens a questions:

  • how stable is this code considered to be?
  • are there any trade-offs to consider?
  • is there an effort to merge those changes upstream?

Would you mind adding a note to the README with some information for everyone's benefit? Thanks!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions