Skip to content

Conversation

@dmethvin
Copy link
Member

Cross-frame stuff in general makes me queasy but this seems to work. I tried several different ways but this seemed to gzip better.

@scottgonzalez
Copy link
Member

:-)

@dmethvin
Copy link
Member Author

Leaking memory in my 1.x-master test so I'll wait until after this beta

dmethvin added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2013
(cherry picked from commit 6d5dfa0eda2c19e8838930fafff83b596654eca2)
Manually edited for conflicts.
@dmethvin dmethvin closed this in 9b6f074 Oct 23, 2013
dmethvin added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2013
…."

This reverts commit bba8366.

Because cross-frame focus sucks.
dmethvin added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2013
@dmethvin dmethvin reopened this Oct 23, 2013
@dmethvin
Copy link
Member Author

I think i figured out the problems here and am going to make another run at it.

@dmethvin
Copy link
Member Author

In my local branch this is passing all browsers but Opera 12. Swarmy is using Opera 12/15 as the versions but right now Opera is on 17 and I think we should not be running 12 at all anyway. There's perhaps a bit of controversy here because 12 is the last non-Blink version of Opera but given its low market share and the obscurity of this particular issue (cross-browser focus) I think it's fine that we dump Opera 12 Swarmy testing for now. Thoughts?

@mgol
Copy link
Member

mgol commented Oct 26, 2013

@dmethvin I disagree about Opera 12.1x, it has a pretty large market share in a number of countries; in Poland it's 5-8%, in Russia even more. I think we should keep testing on that.

I'm fine with blacklisting the nastiest test cases for this browser if that helps, though.

@mgol
Copy link
Member

mgol commented Oct 26, 2013

The important part about Opera 12.1x is that it doesn't show the user in any way that it's not the latest version. If you do an update check manually in Opera 12.16, it says it's the newest version.

Also, there is still no version of Opera Blink for Linux (they say the work is in progress).

@dmethvin dmethvin closed this in 1cecf64 Nov 13, 2013
dmethvin added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2013
(cherry picked from commit ebdb467761d756d4e52608a0df4a4d9b17da8092)
(conflicts with .data() resolved manually)
mescoda pushed a commit to mescoda/jquery that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2014
(cherry picked from commit 6d5dfa0eda2c19e8838930fafff83b596654eca2)
Manually edited for conflicts.
mescoda pushed a commit to mescoda/jquery that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2014
…ygh-1369."

This reverts commit bba8366.

Because cross-frame focus sucks.
mescoda pushed a commit to mescoda/jquery that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2014
(cherry picked from commit ebdb467761d756d4e52608a0df4a4d9b17da8092)
(conflicts with .data() resolved manually)
@dmethvin dmethvin deleted the 14180 branch November 5, 2015 19:22
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 18, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants