Skip to content

Vendor cloudpickle 3.0.0 and drop support for Python 3.7.#1515

Merged
tomMoral merged 11 commits into
joblib:masterfrom
ogrisel:cloudpickle-3.0.0
Oct 20, 2023
Merged

Vendor cloudpickle 3.0.0 and drop support for Python 3.7.#1515
tomMoral merged 11 commits into
joblib:masterfrom
ogrisel:cloudpickle-3.0.0

Conversation

@ogrisel

@ogrisel ogrisel commented Oct 16, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

cloudpickle does no longer support Python 3.7 (released more than 5 years ago and no longer supported by the CPython team) so we could bump up the dependency.

Note we should bump up the other Python deps on the CI to also test with recent versions of Python 3.12, numpy, dask and such but we should probably do that in a dedicated PR.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Oct 16, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

All modified lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (6d40201) 95.10% compared to head (15b1fbe) 95.03%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1515      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.10%   95.03%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files          45       45              
  Lines        7553     7553              
==========================================
- Hits         7183     7178       -5     
- Misses        370      375       +5     

see 4 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@tomMoral tomMoral left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Comment thread CHANGES.rst
Comment thread CHANGES.rst
@ogrisel

ogrisel commented Oct 17, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@tomMoral BTW we could probably simplify the loky code base quite significantly by dropping backward compat for Python 3.7.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants