Repository navigation
intake(think-4l14, think-6gti): T-245, Jatloe's Lean proof that s(12) = 4 (#810), and T-246, Daniel's s(29) minimal polynomial (#545, #811) - #812
Merged
Conversation
Retain Queuingtheorydotcom/Jatloe12SquaresFormalized at d0caf45, the commit the tag n12-verified-2026-10-16 names (16 October 2026), for #810 (think-4l14): Jatloe's Lean 4 proof N12Compact.Final.optimality : S12.packingConstant12 = 4, formalized with Ben Gurevitch and Lewis (CTJLewis) and published by Manasseh Ahmed. - jatloe-n12-lean-2026-10-16: 423 of the 426 declared files retained byte for byte: the root files, the two workflow files, the accepted run's evidence (axiom audit, final report, source manifest), the build pins and toolchain lock, the 109-module closure of S12.PackingConstant (every definition the statement uses, and the grid), Compact/Assembly/ and the written mathematics. The scheduler and the checkpoint checker are pinned by digest; the rest of the tree by the commit, and the release's two archives by size and SHA-256 (the evidence archive's digest checked on download). - No licence anywhere in the tree: retained on the owner's 9 October decision recorded on think-gtmb; the follow-up is think-c9ec. - receipts/: devtools.lean_closure over Compact.Assembly.Final (5,377 modules, none missing, no sorry or axiom declaration, 2,572 uses of native_decide) and over S12.PackingConstant; both X posts as the syndication endpoint returned them. - The README states the theorem and its definitions exactly, what the source's run did and did not do (it reused every compiled object), and a build plan priced from the source's own per-module receipts: 16.6 serial wall-hours, 17 to 39 CPU-hours. Nothing was built here. Add the bibliography key [Jatloe n12 Lean 2026-10-16] and its archive-index row. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S2rbZ7xerQ4fKxNFFjVYwR
Stage 4 statement audit of Queuingtheorydotcom/Jatloe12SquaresFormalized at d0caf45 (tag n12-verified-2026-10-16), bead think-4l14, issue #810. Read line by line, N12Compact.Final.optimality : S12.packingConstant12 = 4 states the unrestricted problem as an infimum the 4-by-3 grid attains, with no premise. The trust base is the kernel, three standard axioms and 1,624 native_decide axioms that map one to one onto the calls of 1,525 declarations. Two major findings (compiler trust; no inspectable build) bind the wording; none blocks registering the formalization as the source's report. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S2rbZ7xerQ4fKxNFFjVYwR
jlevy
added
the
intake
Owner
Author
|
Generated by Claude Code |
…(stage 3) Register the Lean proof retained in the previous commit as reported, for #810 (think-4l14): - T-243, kind optimality, V0/C0: N12Compact.Final.optimality : S12.packingConstant12 = 4, Jatloe's proof formalized with Ben Gurevitch and Lewis and published by Manasseh Ahmed, credited "Jatloe, Gurevitch, Lewis, Ahmed"; draft S5, scored as a claim as T-060, T-153 and T-194 were. Its evidence E-n012-jatloe-lean-report, with the source's axiom audit as its axioms receipt, and a coverage entry. No source-build entry: the accepting run reused every compiled object, in a repository that is not public, and no audit has read its receipts. - Unfinished confirmations: the stage 4 statement audit and mathematical review (C1, think-4l14, the audit under way as its activity) and a complete build of the 5,377-module closure (C3, think-dd3v), priced from the source's per-module receipts at about 28 CPU-hours, 17 to 40, within the owner's 40 CPU-hour item cap at its high reading and gated on a machine whose memory is known. - n-012.md: the reported lower lane takes the claim (4, unavoidable points) and the reported status reads proved, as n-011's took T-060's and n-017's T-153's; the verified lanes (7943/2000 and 4) and the status stay open. An intake paragraph, a priority note and the resource; the verification-code block is unchanged. - result-requests.yaml: #810's entry, mapped to T-243, no replies yet. - sqpack.cli.validate: the frontier corpus tripwire's reported-open counts fall by one in every corpus, as T-153's did at n = 17. - intake-watch.yaml: a read of the repository through d0caf45, its head and the pin. - Contributors: a profile for Jatloe with the X handle jatloe; n12 sources on Lewis's and Ahmed's profiles; the occurrence joins of the new bibliography and case-record credits, Gurevitch's left unresolved since "Ben Gurevitch" is not evidenced as the profile's Benjamin Gurevitch. Views rendered: RESULTS.md, INVENTORY.md, STATUS.md, VERIFIERS.md, the synopsis headline, row and count, the research report's tables, the URL registry, the T-007 consumer audit. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S2rbZ7xerQ4fKxNFFjVYwR
…a packet (stage 2) The owner asked on 25 October that Evan Daniel's s(29) minimal polynomial be captured as a result and his announcement linked (#811). Retain the thread's first post, as X's syndication endpoint returned it on 25 October (receipts/announcement/tweet-2110154454817448106.json in the evand-exact-data-2026-10-12 packet): @evanbd, display name Evan Daniel, 2026-10-13T23:43:21Z, "I wish to present my new favorite square packing problem: 29 squares. [...] But rather for the side length, which is truly cursed." The follow-ups have no ids here and are not retained; the packet README quotes them as transcribed for the owner and says so. Evan Daniel's profile gains his X account, evidenced by the retained post, and a sentence on the s(29) polynomial; the bibliography note of [Daniel exact and local reports 2026-10-12] quotes the post. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S2rbZ7xerQ4fKxNFFjVYwR
…s' no-change record check_release_impact names the four papers whose inputs this branch changes. The explainer counts registered results, 242 to 243, so it takes v0.4.28. The optimality review, the threshold-bound review and the methods survey render all 51 files byte-identical twice from this tree and once with main's five changed inputs swapped in and the new profile removed, at link revision bb756e1, so they keep v0.1.11, v0.1.4 and v0.2.7. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S2rbZ7xerQ4fKxNFFjVYwR
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S2rbZ7xerQ4fKxNFFjVYwR
…l, as a new kind, exact side (stage 3) TAXONOMY CHANGE FOR THE OWNER TO APPROVE. This commit adds a thirteenth result kind, `exact-side`: "the exact algebraic value of the side of one stated configuration, with no bound and no optimality claimed". None of the twelve fits Daniel's claim: an upper bound needs evidence that the packing is valid at the stated side, and the source does not check non-overlap at sigma; each of the other kinds asserts something the source does not claim. The kind is a structural kind, like rigidity: its cited evidence claims `derived-structure` and its headline states no relation on s(n). Once the packing is decided at the side, the first kind rule makes such a result an upper bound. Touched: the schema enum and description (results.schema.yaml), epistemics.md's Result Kinds table, a sixth kind rule and the structural-kinds sentence, devtools.check_results (KINDS, STRUCTURE_KINDS, "an exact side" in one refusal), and the site topic vocabulary that follows KINDS: the changelog schema's topic enum and the two topic rows that rung_scale generates in paper-design.md. Tests: a synthetic exact-side record in test_results_register.py (accepted with derived-structure evidence, refused with upper-bound evidence or a relation in its headline), two live refusals (T-244 as an upper bound, T-009 and T-004 as exact sides), and test_recent_results's no-standing kinds. The house-writer replay test projects out what T-244 adds to the adopted n = 29 record: its citation, resource and dated paragraph (LATER_PENDING_REPORTS, whose note now admits a registration with no bound) and its rewrite of the analytic characterization (LATER_HISTORY_REWRITES, new); adopt_houses --check is unchanged and passes. The registration, V0/C0, draft S3: - T-244: Evan Daniel reports that the side sigma = 5.93383346267692918968946061635201913843383418107... of the best known packing of 29 squares (Schadt's, as Ellsworth improved it; certified by T-155 and T-195) is a root of an irreducible integer polynomial of degree 7213, with a 325-digit leading coefficient and coefficients of up to 5,074 digits (evand/square-packing 169a827, N29.md; the release exact-data-2026-10-12; the announcement thread on X of 13 October). It states no bound. Its evidence, E-n029-evand-minpoly-7213-report (derived-structure, reported), has the packet's release.json, which pins s29-minpoly.tar.zst by digest, as its certificate. Unfinished: C1, the stage 4 review of N29.md (think-6gti); C3, the source's five-step replay, about 2.5 CPU-hours, waiting on an owner budget (think-10m1, new). - Significance S3, drafted above the S2 of T-120 to T-123: the exact value of a record side the record held only as decimals and rationals, of degree 7213, an order of magnitude above the largest degree the record otherwise states (672 at 83), by a full homotopy solve. No bound, so not S4. For the reviewing lane to confirm. The case's lanes are unchanged: both hold T-195's rational certificate, of degree 1, which adopt_houses writes, so the reported lane cannot carry degree 7213; n-029.md's analytic characterization now gives the degree, the release and the pinned asset in place of "no minimal polynomial anywhere", with a dated pointer at the top, and cites the new evidence and the source key. T-195's exact side agrees with sigma to the 68 places N29.md prints and lies inside the Krawczyk enclosure; which is larger is not decided here. source-coverage.yaml: the evand-exact-and-local-reports-2026-10-12 entry takes n = 29, the new evidence and its represented_by, and its note no longer says the s(29) report has no evidence entry. result-requests.yaml: #545's s29 result maps to T-244 and its evidence (think-10m1 joins its beads); #811, the owner's tracker opened today, is entered (intake, a queued ask and answer bead think-jmb4, new). T-243 is reserved for the n = 12 registration on the coordinator's branch, so on this branch alone check_results fails only the id contiguity rule; with T-244 renumbered in a scratch copy it passes. Views rendered: RESULTS.md, INVENTORY.md, VERIFIERS.md (STATUS.md checked current), the synopsis headline, row and count, and the URL registry. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S2rbZ7xerQ4fKxNFFjVYwR
Owner
Author
|
The merge commit is being prepared and goes up with the next push. Generated by Claude Code |
Resolve result-requests.yaml by keeping #799's entry and #810's, in issue order, and release.py by keeping W8's no-change record and the #810 one as separate entries. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S2rbZ7xerQ4fKxNFFjVYwR
…st main 886dddc Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S2rbZ7xerQ4fKxNFFjVYwR
Owner
Author
|
Generated by Claude Code |
…o the #810 import T-244, Evan Daniel's reported degree-7213 minimal polynomial of the s(29) record side, registered as the new kind exact side, joins T-243 on this branch, so the id contiguity rule the T-244 branch failed alone now holds. Conflicts, resolved: - packing/frontier/results.yaml: both registrations kept, T-243 then T-244. - packing/campaign/result-requests.yaml: both entries kept, #799 and #810 from this branch, then #811; #545's mapping of its s29 result to T-244 and the think-10m1 bead merged cleanly. - packing/frontier/RESULTS.md, packing/site-urls.yaml and docs/project/site-urls.md: taken from this branch and regenerated with render_results --update and site_urls --write; INVENTORY.md and VERIFIERS.md regenerated with render_evidence_inventory and render_verifiers; the synopsis headline was already current. - SYNOPSIS.md: the research-status row reads 244 registered, 212 by others, the figures check_synopsis derives. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S2rbZ7xerQ4fKxNFFjVYwR
Owner
Author
|
Generated by Claude Code |
T-243 made n = 12's reported status proved, so the frontier corpus prints 88 proved and 236 open in its reported lane at n = 1..324, as packing-validate --only "frontier corpus" printed here; the n = 1..100 and n = 1..200 splits follow sqpack.cli.validate's FRONTIER_COUNTS, 52 and 132 reported-open. The comment above the assertion names the later closures. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S2rbZ7xerQ4fKxNFFjVYwR
Owner
Author
|
The fixes for all three CI failures ( Generated by Claude Code |
Owner
Author
|
Generated by Claude Code |
T-243 made n = 12 reported-proved at 4, so four tests that used its row as a worked example read it as it now stands, each keeping what it proves: - test_site_frontier_table, centring: n = 12's Status holds two lanes, 102 px that fill its 124.6 px row, so the tall row is n = 70's (97.7 px from its reported fraction, a one-chip Status of n = 1's height); the check now also holds the two Status cells to the same content height. - test_site_frontier_table, decimals: n = 12's reported cell holds a whole 4 and no decimal, its verified cell 7943/2000 with = 3.9715, the gap = 0.0285; n = 88's reported 481/50 (= 9.62) is the reported column's terminating example. The docstring and CASES comment record T-243. - test_frontier_page: the = 3.9715 decimal is n = 12's verified bound's, and its reported 4 carries none. - test_evand_square_packing: Daniel's rescaled points are n = 12's verified bound, whose two evidence entries cite squarepacker's v1.1; the reported bound is T-243's 4 from Jatloe's Lean report. Run here with the pinned Chromium build this host has (SQPACK_CHROMIUM, SQPACK_REQUIRE_CHROMIUM=1): the three modules and the seventeen others that pin n = 12, n = 29 or the project cards, 1387 passed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S2rbZ7xerQ4fKxNFFjVYwR
…rview's project cards - credit-attributions.json: n = 12's reported lower credit names Jatloe, Gurevitch, Lewis and Ahmed, [Jatloe n12 Lean 2026-10-16] and E-n012-jatloe-lean-report, as the case record does, which is what test_curated_print_credits_match_current_case_and_citation_associations holds it to; its verified citation stays T-095's. - site_resources.OTHER_PROJECTS: a card for Queuingtheorydotcom/Jatloe12SquaresFormalized, the source repository the coverage register reviews (jatloe-n12-lean-2026-10-16), credited as the record credits it, beside the n = 11 formalization's card. T-244's sources are evand/square-packing's, which already has one. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S2rbZ7xerQ4fKxNFFjVYwR
…nge record measured at 9b8b004 check_release_impact names the four papers whose inputs this branch changes against main 886dddc. The explainer counts registered results, 242 on main and 244 here, so its proposed v0.4.28, not yet published, now names both registrations, as v0.4.24 named five. A second cut, v0.4.29 over v0.4.28, was tried first and refused: a pull request is held to one owning decision from main's v0.4.27 to its head version. The optimality review, the threshold-bound review and the methods survey render all 51 files byte-identical twice from this tree and once with main's nine candidate inputs swapped in and jatloe.md removed, at link revision 9b8b004, so they keep v0.1.11, v0.1.4 and v0.2.7; the record's paths take the four inputs the T-244 merge and the overview card add. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S2rbZ7xerQ4fKxNFFjVYwR
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S2rbZ7xerQ4fKxNFFjVYwR
…nto the #810 import The stage 4 statement audit of Jatloe12SquaresFormalized at d0caf45 (think-4l14), written by w-n12-audit-1025 in its own worktree. No conflicts: the branch adds the review alone. Its follow-ups (the document map, a maintained tool for its counts, the register's citation) follow. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S2rbZ7xerQ4fKxNFFjVYwR
docs/project/document-map.yaml maps review-2026-10-25-n12-lean-formalization-statement-audit.md as a retained review record, beside the other reviews of 25 October, and render_document_map renders SYNOPSIS's copy of the map. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S2rbZ7xerQ4fKxNFFjVYwR
…'s counts as a maintained tool The statement audit counted with programs in its scratch space (a token scan, an instance classifier, a shadowing search, the mapping of native axioms to their owners and a manifest comparison), and OR-1 asks for a kept tool before an entry cites them. devtools.audit_n12_lean does all five, reusing devtools.audit_n11_lean's TOKENS and strip_code: - scan CHECKOUT reads every module of the packet's closure receipt by the Git blob it names, from the checkout's object database (each path's blob checked at the receipt's commit; no working tree, nothing run), and writes receipts/statement-audit.json (257 lines, 40 KB): token, set_option and instance censuses over the whole closure and over the statement closure of S12.PackingConstant; every declaration of the statement's names; each native_decide axiom of the source's log matched to the calls of its owner, with the off-path calls by module; and every module against the run manifest's SHA-256, the log and the manifest against SOURCE-PROVENANCE.json's digests. - check recomputes the statement closure's part and the run evidence from the packet's retained bytes and compares. Run against the clone of Jatloe12SquaresFormalized at d0caf45, read as data: 5,377 modules, 2,572 native_decide calls in 2,274 declarations; 1,624 native axioms owned by 1,525 declarations, each owner's axioms equal to its calls; 948 calls in 749 declarations off the path; the statement closure 109 modules, 1,138,482 bytes, 723 calls; no manifest mismatch; the log equal to the native audit. Every figure the review cites reproduces, except the review's "eight comments" naming the word axiom, which is six in the closure; the review now says six, cites the tool and the receipt in place of the scratch programs, and adds the one @[irreducible] and the one OfNat the census finds. The packet README describes the receipt. The packet already retained the closure receipts, verification/run-38849916588/ and SOURCE-PROVENANCE.json, so nothing else was added. Tests (tests/test_audit_n12_lean.py) run the tool on a synthetic project in a scratch Git repository and hold the retained receipt to the packet and to the review. integrity-ceremony.yaml allowlists the tool's one digest comparison as an external-checkout boundary: another repository's bytes against its own run manifest. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S2rbZ7xerQ4fKxNFFjVYwR
- T-243: a reviews entry for the statement audit of 25 October (kind adversarial, reviewer_kind ai, relation project, verdict accepted, covers T-243), its scope in the review's words with its findings M-1, M-2, m-1, m-2 and N-1 to N-3; a composition paragraph on what it read and what binds the record (kernel and compiler, M-1; no build anyone can inspect, the accepting run compiling nothing on objects from a run that failed, M-2); the claim says the statement was audited and the proof not reviewed. The in-analysis activity for the audit is removed, since the work landed; next_rung and the C1 unfinished confirmation name the mathematical review alone. Rungs unchanged at V0/C0: a reading of the statement is no read of the proof, and the review adds nothing to V4's count while V3 is absent. Artifacts take the review, the receipt and the tool. - E-n012-jatloe-lean-report: proof.audit_record names the review; verifiers names V-audit-n12-lean, registered in verifiers.yaml as the n17 source-manifest checker was; the third assumption says the 5,377 modules read are the manifest's bytes, and the limitations what the audit read. - n-012.md: the lane note, the priority note and the intake paragraph say the statement was audited and the proof not yet reviewed. - Views: RESULTS.md, INVENTORY.md and VERIFIERS.md rendered; site-urls rewritten with t-243's identity re-derived, its row not yet on main. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S2rbZ7xerQ4fKxNFFjVYwR
… T-243 cites its statement audit Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S2rbZ7xerQ4fKxNFFjVYwR
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S2rbZ7xerQ4fKxNFFjVYwR
check_no_embedded_js read `fun a b : Nat => a < b` in a test string as a JavaScript arrow function; the Lean is written with ↦, which Lean accepts and the guard does not match. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S2rbZ7xerQ4fKxNFFjVYwR
jlevy
changed the title
Owner
Author
|
Generated by Claude Code |
…results become T-245 and T-246 Main registered T-243, Evan Daniel's certificate at 182 (#806), and open PR #813 holds T-244 for Hyukdong Kim's exact sides at 172 and 263 (#804). No open branch goes past T-244, so this branch's two results take the next free ids: Jatloe's reported Lean proof that s(12) = 4 (#810, think-4l14) is T-245, and Daniel's degree-7213 s(29) minimal polynomial (#545, #811, think-6gti) is T-246. Main's T-243 is kept exactly. Every file this branch changed was merged three ways from its own version with T-244 to T-246 and T-243 to T-245 (and t-243/t-244 to t-245/t-246) applied first, the merge base, which names neither id, and main, so no reference to main's T-243 was rewritten. Conflicts were resolved by keeping both sides' entries whole: #806's request entry before #810's and #811's; main's n182 occurrences, evidence atoms, coverage source and bibliography key before this branch's; main's evand/square-packing watch read before the Jatloe12SquaresFormalized one; main's result/t-243.html row before t-245 and t-246; and in results.yaml, T-243 before T-245 and T-246. In release.py the explainer takes v0.4.29 over main's v0.4.28, main's v0.4.28 entry and decision kept; main's no-change record is kept whole beside this branch's; DATA_REVISION is main's until it is re-pinned. RESULTS, INVENTORY, VERIFIERS, STATUS, the synopsis tables and site-urls.md were re-rendered by their generators; SYNOPSIS counts 245 registered, 213 by others. check_results reports one problem, by design until #813 lands: the ids are not contiguous, T-244 being #813's. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S2rbZ7xerQ4fKxNFFjVYwR
… the merge of main 46e3555 Main (#814) registered T-243 at 182 and took the explainer's v0.4.28, so this branch's results became T-245 and T-246 and the explainer takes v0.4.29. The optimality review, the threshold-bound review and the methods survey, rendered at link revision ab33e3b into empty site directories twice from this tree and once with main's nine candidate inputs swapped in and jatloe.md removed, write all 51 files byte-identical across the three, so they keep v0.1.11, v0.1.4 and v0.2.7. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S2rbZ7xerQ4fKxNFFjVYwR
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S2rbZ7xerQ4fKxNFFjVYwR
jlevy
changed the title
…to keep its 24 pages The hosted pdf job at 5c28c3b drew 25 pages against EXPECTED_PAGE_COUNT 24, the overflow #814 met with v0.4.28's line (456b090). The local draw does not reproduce the overflow (24 pages with either line), so the hosted job is the check. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S2rbZ7xerQ4fKxNFFjVYwR
Owner
Author
|
CI at
Generated by Claude Code |
…on to that The hosted pdf job 121136267504 at f3af1c4 still drew 25 pages against EXPECTED_PAGE_COUNT 24 after the v0.4.29 history line was cut to one line: v0.4.28 had kept 24 only by cutting its own entry, so the page held no room for another. The count is now 25 with the reason beside it, as e51dbba moved it from 23 to 24 for v0.4.13. The local headless shell (build 1243, not the pinned 1234) draws 24 with either line, so the hosted draw is the measurement. test_check_published_site and test_render_n11_lower_bounds_explainer_pdf: 229 passed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S2rbZ7xerQ4fKxNFFjVYwR
…, with the page-count module check_release_impact counts render_n11_lower_bounds_explainer_pdf.py as a candidate input of the three no-change papers. Rendered at link revision bbc8c86 twice from the tree and once with main's copy of that module swapped in: 51 files each, all byte-identical. check_release_impact --baseline-ref origin/main passes; release_pin needs no re-pin; test_release and test_cut_release: 44 passed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S2rbZ7xerQ4fKxNFFjVYwR
…; the explainer takes v0.4.30 Main registered T-244, Hyukdong Kim's exact sides at 172 and 263 (#804), and took the explainer's v0.4.29 with a page count of 25. Main's highest id is T-244 and no branch on origin other than this one uses T-245 or T-246, so this branch's two results keep their ids and the register is contiguous again: Jatloe's reported Lean proof that s(12) = 4 (#810, think-4l14) is T-245, and Daniel's degree-7213 s(29) minimal polynomial (#545, #811, think-6gti) is T-246. Conflicts were resolved by keeping both sides' entries whole, main's first: in results.yaml, T-244 before T-245 and T-246 (git appended main's T-244 after them; it was moved, unchanged, into id order); Kim's occurrences, evidence atom, coverage source and bibliography key before this branch's; result/t-244.html's row before t-245 and t-246. result-requests.yaml merged cleanly in issue order (#804, #806, #810, #811). In release.py, main's v0.4.29 history entry and decision are kept exactly; this branch's explainer entry becomes v0.4.30 with a v0.4.29 to v0.4.30 decision; main's no-change record is kept whole beside this branch's; DATA_REVISION is main's until it is re-pinned. render_n11_lower_bounds_explainer_pdf.py is main's exactly: it already holds 25 pages, with main's reason, so this branch's duplicate bump and comment are dropped. RESULTS, INVENTORY, VERIFIERS, STATUS, the synopsis tables and site-urls were re-rendered by their generators; SYNOPSIS counts 246 registered, 214 by others. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S2rbZ7xerQ4fKxNFFjVYwR
…6268 after the merge of main 01e2b52 Main took the page-count module's 25 itself, so the merge left that module main's own and it is no longer a candidate input of the three no-change papers; it leaves the record's paths. Rendered at link revision 8a36268 into empty site directories twice from the tree and once with main's result-requests.yaml, ctjlewis.md, evan-daniel.md, manasseh-ahmed.md, check_results.py, site_resources.py, n-029.md, results.yaml and source-coverage.yaml swapped in and jatloe.md removed: 51 files each, all byte-identical across the three. check_release_impact --baseline-ref origin/main passes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S2rbZ7xerQ4fKxNFFjVYwR
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S2rbZ7xerQ4fKxNFFjVYwR
…e projects section medium The merge of main 01e2b52 put both new project cards on the Resources page, Kim's issue 804 card (168 reading characters) and this branch's Jatloe12SquaresFormalized card (194). With 61 cards the section's typical (median) card read 160 characters, CARD_LARGE_FROM, so test_overview's test_each_sections_size_is_what_its_typical_card_asks_for failed: the section is declared medium. Each side alone had 60 cards and a median of 159. The note now reads "A Lean 4 proof of s(12) = 4, trusting Lean's compiler for its certificates." (156 reading characters with the name and address), keeping the claim and the trust caveat, and the median is 158. The median now sits two characters under the threshold, so the next long project card may flip it again. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S2rbZ7xerQ4fKxNFFjVYwR
…72d4, after the card trim site_resources.py is a candidate input of the three no-change papers. Rendered at link revision d0d72d4 into empty site directories twice from the tree and once with main 01e2b52's nine candidate inputs swapped in and jatloe.md removed: 51 files each, all byte-identical across the three, and identical to the 8a36268 renders once the link revision is normalized. check_release_impact --baseline-ref origin/main passes; release_pin --check: the pin is the last data commit, 8a36268. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S2rbZ7xerQ4fKxNFFjVYwR
PR Summary by QodoRegister reported s(12) Lean proof and s(29) minimal polynomial
AI Description
Diagram
High-Level Assessment
Files changed (79)
|
Code Review by Qodo 1. Bad or missing input files crash the audit tool
|
![qodo-code-review[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/484649?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Comment on lines
+595
to
+610
| if arguments.command == "check": | ||
| problems = check(arguments.receipt, arguments.closure) | ||
| for problem in problems: | ||
| print(problem) | ||
| if not problems: | ||
| print(f"{_path(arguments.receipt)} agrees with the packet") | ||
| return 1 if problems else 0 | ||
| closure = load_closure(arguments.closure) | ||
| receipt = audit( | ||
| read_checkout(arguments.checkout, closure), | ||
| closure, | ||
| closure_path=arguments.closure, | ||
| run=arguments.run, | ||
| provenance=arguments.provenance, | ||
| statement_targets=arguments.statement, | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
1. Bad or missing input files crash the audit tool 📘 Rule violation ☼ Reliability
main() in audit_n12_lean.py has no try/except around load_closure, read_checkout, audit or check, so OSError, json.JSONDecodeError, KeyError and the IndexError from log_axioms (when the log lacks depends on axioms:) reach the user as raw tracebacks. A wrong checkout path, a damaged closure receipt or a truncated axiom log in either scan or check produces a traceback and no concise refusal line.
Agent Prompt
## Issue description
`main()` in the n12 audit tool lets file, JSON and parse errors surface as tracebacks.
## Fix Focus Areas
- packing/devtools/audit_n12_lean.py[343-346]
- packing/devtools/audit_n12_lean.py[581-617]
## Recommended Fix
Wrap the command dispatch in `main()` in `try/except (OSError, json.JSONDecodeError, KeyError, ValueError, IndexError)`. Print `refused: {e}` to stderr and return 2. Make `log_axioms` raise a `ValueError` with a clear message when the marker is absent.
ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools
Comment on lines
+545
to
+550
| statement = subclosure(closure, kept["statement_targets"]) | ||
| fresh = audit( | ||
| read_retained(closure, statement), | ||
| closure, | ||
| closure_path=closure_path, | ||
| statement_targets=kept["statement_targets"], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
4. A different statement can pass the audit 🐞 Bug ≡ Correctness
audit_n12_lean.check takes statement_targets from the receipt being checked instead of requiring the declared statement target. A changed receipt can name another module and include its recomputed statement section, and check will accept it as agreeing with the packet without auditing the intended theorem statement.
Agent Prompt
## Issue description
The receipt selects its own statement target during verification, so a changed target can pass the packet check.
## Fix Focus Areas
- packing/devtools/audit_n12_lean.py[545-555]
## Recommended Fix
Require the receipt's statement targets to equal the tool's declared targets, and recompute from those declared targets rather than from the receipt. Test that changing the target makes `check` fail.
ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools
| - Jatloe | ||
| - Gurevitch | ||
| - Lewis | ||
| - Ahmed |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
2. The record credits a publisher as prover 🐞 Bug ≡ Correctness
The new reported_lower_bound.proved_by list includes Ahmed, and his contributor occurrence assigns him the lower-bound-prover role. The retained source credits Jatloe with the proof, Gurevitch with formalization aid and Lewis with refactoring and compilation; the new case note instead describes Ahmed's role as publishing it.
Agent Prompt
## Issue description
The reported lower-bound prover field assigns the publication role to Ahmed, contrary to the roles stated in the retained source.
## Fix Focus Areas
- packing/frontier/n-012.md[43-53]
- packing/contributors/occurrences.yaml[16092-16108]
## Recommended Fix
Keep Ahmed's publication and announcement credit in the case note and source attribution, but remove him from the `proved_by` list and change or remove the corresponding lower-bound-prover occurrence.
ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools
Comment on lines
+120
to
+130
| _OWNER = re.compile( | ||
| r"(?m)^(?:@\[[^\]]*\]\s*)?(?:(?:private|protected|noncomputable|nonrec)\s+)*" | ||
| r"(theorem|lemma|def|abbrev|instance|example|namespace|end|section)\b\s*(" + _NAME + r")?" | ||
| ) | ||
| #: Any declaration a name can resolve to, or a scope command, indented or not. | ||
| _DECLARATION = re.compile( | ||
| r"(?m)^[ \t]*(?:@\[[^\]]*\]\s*)?" | ||
| r"(?:(?:private|protected|noncomputable|nonrec|partial)\s+)*" | ||
| r"(theorem|lemma|def|abbrev|structure|class|inductive|instance|opaque|axiom|namespace|end" | ||
| r"|section)\b\s*(" + _NAME + r")?" | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
5. Scope regex can skip the next declaration 🐞 Bug ≡ Correctness
_OWNER and _DECLARATION end with \b\s*(NAME)?, and \s matches newlines. So after a bare section, a noncomputable section or a bare end, the name group takes the first word of the next line (namespace, theorem, def), and that line is never matched as a command of its own. Any native_decide calls in a swallowed theorem drop out of native_sites, and a swallowed namespace puts shadowing out of step: a later end Foo closes the wrong scope, so qualified names and nested-namespace detection come out wrong.
Agent Prompt
## Issue description
`_OWNER` and `_DECLARATION` in packing/devtools/audit_n12_lean.py use `\b\s*(NAME)?`. `\s` crosses newlines, so after a bare `section`, `noncomputable section` or `end`, the next line's keyword (`theorem`, `namespace`, ...) is taken as the name and that declaration is skipped.
## Fix Focus Areas
- packing/devtools/audit_n12_lean.py[120-130]
## Recommended Fix
Replace `\b\s*(` with `\b[ \t]*(` in both patterns, so the optional name must sit on the same line. Add a test with `noncomputable section\nnamespace Foo\ntheorem bar ... native_decide\nend Foo\nend`. It should report `Foo.bar` as a site, and the namespace stack should come out balanced.
ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools
Comment on lines
+613
to
+617
| clean = not receipt["manifest"]["sha256_mismatches"] and not ( | ||
| receipt["native"]["owners_without_a_site"] | ||
| or receipt["native"]["owners_whose_axioms_are_not_their_calls"] | ||
| ) | ||
| return 0 if clean else 1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
3. Audit passes despite digest or axiom mismatch 🐞 Bug ☼ Reliability
audit_n12_lean.main marks scan clean using only SHA and native-owner/call mismatches, while check compares fresh evidence only with the stored receipt rather than enforcing the manifest, provenance, and axiom-log invariants that run_evidence records. When a manifest entry is missing, a provenance digest disagrees, the log differs from the native final audit, or sorryAx appears, the command can still exit 0, and a regenerated receipt can still pass test_the_retained_receipt_agrees_with_the_packet.
Agent Prompt
## Issue description
`audit_n12_lean` records manifest coverage and paths, provenance digest agreement, final-axiom-audit agreement, and `sorryAx`, but neither `scan` nor `check` fails when those invariants are violated.
## Fix Focus Areas
- packing/devtools/audit_n12_lean.py[452-480]
- packing/devtools/audit_n12_lean.py[540-566]
- packing/devtools/audit_n12_lean.py[611-617]
## Recommended Fix
Add an `invariant_problems(receipt)` helper that reports manifest module or path disagreement with the closure, either computed digest differing from its SOURCE-PROVENANCE digest, axiom-log disagreement with the native audit's final axioms, `sorryAx`, and standard axioms other than `STANDARD_AXIOMS`. Call it on the fresh receipt from `check` and include its results in `main`'s `scan` clean verdict. Add failure-path tests for these conditions.
ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools
| - rigidity | ||
| - case-exclusion | ||
| - restricted-optimality | ||
| - exact-side |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
6. Schema rejects exact side as a proved kind 🐞 Bug ⚙ Maintainability
The PR adds exact-side to the kind enum in results.schema.yaml but not to the sibling proves_kind enum, while check_results.kind_problems accepts any conclusion in KINDS. So a later formalization or simplification of an exact side (for example a Lean proof of one of the lower-degree exact forms) would pass check_results and still fail schema validation.
Agent Prompt
## Issue description
results.schema.yaml adds `exact-side` to `kind` but not to `proves_kind`, while check_results accepts it as a conclusion.
## Fix Focus Areas
- packing/frontier/results.schema.yaml[204-206]
## Recommended Fix
Add `exact-side` to the `proves_kind` enum after `restricted-optimality`. If second proofs of exact sides should not be allowed, exclude `exact-side` explicitly in `kind_problems` instead, so the schema and the checker agree.
ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools
jlevy
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 25, 2026
T-245, Jatloe's reported Lean proof that s(12) = 4, landed at S5 in #812 (merged 2026-10-25T14:28:27Z, 272b411), so it owes a News item in the first change after the merge (result-import.md, stage 7). The entry states V0/C0, the compiler trust, the reused-object run and the unreplayed build, and mentions T-246 (S3, no item owed) without listing it in result_ids. - site-changelog.yaml: the entry, dated the merge day, with publication evidence the verified main Pages run 40202397886; #812's delivery row and coverage number, from devtools.import_changelog --metadata (REST export of #812, no gh CLI here). - CHANGELOG.md re-rendered by devtools.render_changelog. - tests: the News box now leads with T-245's S5 card, then T-194's and T-154's; the two tests pinning its first cards follow. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S2rbZ7xerQ4fKxNFFjVYwR
This was referenced Oct 25, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this branch cost
This branch imports two results and registers each as reported (V0/C0). The first is Jatloe's Lean proof that s(12) = 4 (T-245, #810). The second is Evan Daniel's degree-7213 minimal polynomial of the s(29) record side (T-246, #545 and #811). It also adds a statement audit of the n = 12 theorem with a maintained tool behind it.
devtools.render_pr_rollupfinds no rollup for the branch. The coordinator's wall ran from 05:21 to about 07:25 UTC on 25 October. Five sub-agents worked inside it, some in parallel: records 88 minutes, statement audit 26, s(29) 83, integration 98, and an assessment of the old polynomial stack 17. Their walls overlap and are not summed. Nothing was replayed or built: the n = 12 rebuild (about 28 CPU-hours by the source's receipts) and the s(29) replay (about 2.5 CPU-hours) wait for an owner budget.New Results and Their Significance
This PR carries the S5 label for T-245. Significance is separate from correctness, and the stage 4 review confirms or changes both scores.
Results and Dispositions
d0caf45injatloe-n12-lean-2026-10-16: the statement closure, the assembly, the run evidence and the mathematics. The release assets are pinned by digest. Registered as reported. n-012's reported lane takes 4; its verified lanes stay at 7943/2000 and 4E-n012-jatloe-lean-reportthink-4l14; build underthink-dd3v(gated on an owner budget); licence underthink-c9ecnative_decideaxioms. Findings M-1: the compiler is trusted, so every description says "kernel and compiler". M-2: the accepting run compiled 0 modules and the upstream repository is private. Also m-1, m-2 and N-1 to N-3docs/project/reviews/review-2026-10-25-n12-lean-formalization-statement-audit.md;devtools.audit_n12_leanand its receiptexact-side. The polynomial is pinned by digest inevand-exact-data-2026-10-12, and the announcement post is retained. n-029's lanes are unchanged (T-195's rational house), and its prose gives the degree and the assetE-n029-evand-minpoly-7213-reportthink-6gti; replay underthink-10m1; #811 reply underthink-jmb4main, and its register tooling no longer runs onmain's adoption codethink-vt31think-vgsw) after this one landsChanges by Purpose
packing/resources/web/jatloe-n12-lean-2026-10-16/,packing/resources/web/evand-exact-data-2026-10-12/packing/frontier/{results,evidence,source-coverage}.yaml,n-012.md,n-029.md,packing/campaign/{result-requests,intake-watch}.yaml,packing/contributors/exact-sideresults.schema.yaml,epistemics.md,devtools/check_results.pydevtools.audit_n12_leanreads the closure by Git blob and runs nothing from the sourcepacking/devtools/audit_n12_lean.py,tests/test_audit_n12_lean.py,receipts/statement-audit.jsonsite_resources.py,credit-attributions.json,tests/test_site_frontier_table.py,tests/test_validation_cli.pyDATA_REVISIONre-pinnedpacking/src/sqpack/release.pyValidation
15caac7a(after merging main01e2b529, records(#804): Hyukdong Kim's exact sides at 172 and 263 as T-244; 88, 126 and 199 are T-193's #813):packing-validate --recordspassed 53 of 53 steps; the id gap is closed.packing-validate --edit --jobs 2 --inner-jobs 1passed 69 of 69. pytest on 22 affected modules: 1,811 passed. The one failure wastest_overview::test_each_sections_size_is_what_its_typical_card_asks_for, fixed ind0d72d41; after the fix,test_overviewandtest_overview_sectionspass (476 tests).check_release_impact --baseline-ref origin/mainandrelease_pin --checkpass.afc95abdevery job passed except the id-gap checks, includingpdfat 25 pages andpages-required. CI on15caac7ais pending. v0.4.30 adds one history entry, which could push the hosted PDF to 26 pages; the local draw stays at 25.Merge order
mainmerged #814 (T-243) and then #813 (T-244, explainer v0.4.29, page count 25) while this PR was open. This PR's results were therefore renumbered to T-245 (n = 12) and T-246 (s(29)), and its explainer record moved to v0.4.30. Comments on this PR before 09:35Z use the old ids, T-243 and T-244.Documentation and Replanning
document-map.yaml, and SYNOPSIS gives 246 registered results.think-vgsw); the n = 12 build (think-dd3v); the s(29) replay (think-10m1).think-gn29) is held by another coordinator.Announcement
It is 300 characters, so it posts as a thread of one line per post. Handles for Jatloe, Lewis and Daniel are missing because
render_announcementreads profiles frompacking/contributors/*.md, while they live incontributors/people/(owner decision below).News
T-245 at S5 owes a News item, which lands in the first change after the merge. The draft is
jatloe-n12-reported-proof, "Jatloe Reports a Lean Proof for 12 Squares". It states V0/C0, the compiler trust and the unreplayed build. T-246 at S3 owes none.Decisions for the Owner
exact-sideresult kind. None of the twelve kinds fits an exact side value with no bound claimed, because the source does not check non-overlap at σ. Approve it, or T-246 falls back to an evidence entry and a case-page paragraph.render_announcementchanges every announcement.n-12label colour. "Ben" against the profile's "Benjamin" is unresolved. The label should be7E3D1D.Limits
Neither result is verified. T-245 rests on the source's own audit of a run that compiled nothing fresh. It trusts Lean's compiler, and its upstream repository is private. T-246 does not decide the packing at σ, and two of its checks are Monte Carlo. Nothing here was rebuilt or replayed.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01S2rbZ7xerQ4fKxNFFjVYwR