forked from sipa/bitcoin
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
Return witness in getblock #1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jl2012
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 30, 2017
c521b3ac6 Merge sipa#11: fixup define checks. Cleans up some oopses from sipa#5. 8b1cd3753 fixup define checks. Cleans up some oopses from sipa#5. 6b1508d6d Merge sipa#6: Fixes typo fceb80542 Merge sipa#10: Clean up compile-time warnings (gcc 7.1) 0ec2a343f Clean up compile-time warnings (gcc 7.1) d4c268a35 Merge sipa#5: Move helper functions out of sse4.2 object 8d4eb0847 Add HasAcceleratedCRC32C to port_win.h 77cfbfd25 crc32: move helper functions out of port_posix_sse.cc 4c1e9e016 silence compiler warnings about uninitialized variables 495316485 Merge #2: Prefer std::atomic over MemoryBarrier 2953978ef Fixes typo f134284a1 Merge #1: Merge upstream LevelDB 1.20 ba8a445fd Prefer std::atomic over MemoryBarrier git-subtree-dir: src/leveldb git-subtree-split: c521b3ac654cfbe009c575eacf7e5a6e189bb5bb
jl2012
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2018
…tion d31e5c1 Fix shutdown in case of errors during initialization (Wladimir J. van der Laan) Pull request description: PR bitcoin#10286 introduced a few steps which are not robust to early shutdown in initialization. Stumbled upon this with bitcoin#11781, not sure if there are other scenarios that can trigger it, but it's good to harden against this in any case. E.g. ``` $ src/bitcoind -debuglogfile=/dfdf Error: Could not open debug log file /dfdf Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. UnregisterValidationInterface (pwalletIn=0x0) at /.../bitcoin/src/validationinterface.cpp:82 82 g_signals.m_internals->BlockChecked.disconnect(boost::bind(&CValidationInterface::BlockChecked, pwalletIn, _1, _2)); (gdb) bt #0 UnregisterValidationInterface (pwalletIn=0x0) at /.../bitcoin/src/validationinterface.cpp:82 #1 0x00005555555a11fc in Shutdown () at /.../bitcoin/src/init.cpp:196 #2 0x00005555555961cc in AppInit (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at /.../bitcoin/src/bitcoind.cpp:183 sipa#3 0x0000555555596249 in main (argc=0, argv=0x555555ecf200) at /.../bitcoin/src/bitcoind.cpp:19 ``` Tree-SHA512: 7dd9570a9803514a17781bfadf1edde47e96df4e852cce2f423cab422e005fb94d44e777af1a6ea5167b04a4d889e848ae7a61a7e0e94232247ddea32ee70fc8
jl2012
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 27, 2018
6f53edb Acquire cs_main before ATMP call in block_assemble bench (James O'Beirne) Pull request description: Calling `bench_bitcoin` currently fails due to calling ATMP without acquiring cs_main first in the recently added block_assemble bench (bitcoin#13219). ``` $ cat <(uname -a) <(gcc --version) Linux james 4.4.0-119-generic bitcoin#143+jamesob SMP Mon Apr 16 21:47:24 EDT 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux gcc (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.9) 5.4.0 20160609 $ ./src/bench/bench_bitcoin WARNING: This is a debug build - may result in slower benchmarks. # Benchmark, evals, iterations, total, min, max, median Assertion failed: lock cs_main not held in validation.cpp:566; locks held: [1] 19323 abort (core dumped) ./src/bench/bench_bitcoin ``` ``` (gdb) bt #0 0x00007fbdc9cf5428 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:54 #1 0x00007fbdc9cf702a in __GI_abort () at abort.c:89 #2 0x0000555a19580dc5 in AssertLockHeldInternal (pszName=pszName@entry=0x555a19834549 "cs_main", pszFile=pszFile@entry=0x555a1988a001 "validation.cpp", nLine=nLine@entry=566, cs=cs@entry=0x555a19ba55c0 <cs_main>) at sync.cpp:157 sipa#3 0x0000555a194b395f in AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker (chainparams=..., pool=..., state=..., ptx=std::shared_ptr (count 1, weak 0) 0x555a1bb819b0, pfMissingInputs=pfMissingInputs@entry=0x0, nAcceptTime=1532964079, plTxnReplaced=0x0, bypass_limits=false, nAbsurdFee=@0x7ffcbc1719d8: 0, coins_to_uncache=std::vector of length 0, capacity 0, test_accept=false) at validation.cpp:566 sipa#4 0x0000555a194ba661 in AcceptToMemoryPoolWithTime (chainparams=..., pool=..., state=..., tx=std::shared_ptr (count 1, weak 0) 0x555a1bb819b0, pfMissingInputs=pfMissingInputs@entry=0x0, nAcceptTime=<optimized out>, plTxnReplaced=0x0, bypass_limits=false, nAbsurdFee=0, test_accept=false) at validation.cpp:998 sipa#5 0x0000555a194ba7ce in AcceptToMemoryPool (pool=..., state=..., tx=std::shared_ptr (count 1, weak 0) 0x555a1bb819b0, pfMissingInputs=pfMissingInputs@entry=0x0, plTxnReplaced=plTxnReplaced@entry=0x0, bypass_limits=bypass_limits@entry=false, nAbsurdFee=0, test_accept=false) at validation.cpp:1014 sipa#6 0x0000555a19363fbe in AssembleBlock (state=...) at bench/block_assemble.cpp:102 sipa#7 0x0000555a193654d3 in std::_Function_handler<void (benchmark::State&), void (*)(benchmark::State&)>::_M_invoke(std::_Any_data const&, benchmark::State&) (__functor=..., __args#0=...) at /usr/include/c++/5/functional:1871 sipa#8 0x0000555a193501d7 in std::function<void (benchmark::State&)>::operator()(benchmark::State&) const (this=this@entry=0x555a1ba2cda0, __args#0=...) at /usr/include/c++/5/functional:2267 sipa#9 0x0000555a1934ec4c in benchmark::BenchRunner::RunAll (printer=..., num_evals=5, scaling=<optimized out>, filter=..., is_list_only=false) at bench/bench.cpp:121 sipa#10 0x0000555a1934ade9 in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at bench/bench_bitcoin.cpp:92 ``` Tree-SHA512: fdd7b28ff123ccea7a4f334d53f735d0c0f94aa9cc52520c2dd34dca45d78c691af64efcd32366fc472fedffbd79591d2be2bb3bfc4a5186e8712b6b452d64e3
jl2012
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 17, 2018
…avoid deprecated zeromq api functions f1bd03e [depends, zmq, doc] upgrade zeromq to 4.2.5 and avoid deprecated zeromq api functions (mruddy) Pull request description: Upgrade the ZeroMQ dependency from version 4.2.3 to the latest stable version 4.2.5. This PR Follows the lead of bitcoin#11986. I upgraded both patch files to correspond to the version `4.2.5` libzmq files. I assume doing so is still necessary and correct. Without updating the patch line numbers, things appear to work, but you get extra log messages while building `depends` because things don't exactly match, e.g.: ``` /bitcoin/depends> make zeromq Extracting zeromq... /bitcoin/depends/sources/zeromq-4.2.5.tar.gz: OK Preprocessing zeromq... patching file src/windows.hpp Hunk #1 succeeded at 58 (offset 3 lines). patching file src/thread.cpp Hunk #1 succeeded at 307 with fuzz 2 (offset 87 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 323 with fuzz 2 (offset 90 lines). ``` Updating the patches seemed cleaner, so I did it. Note that libzmq had some whitespace changes, so that's why the updated patches do too. More info: https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/releases/tag/v4.2.5 tags: libzmq, zmq, 0mq Tree-SHA512: 78659dd276b5311e40634b1bbebb802ddd6b69662ba3c84995ef1e3795c49a78b1635112c7fd72a405ea36e2cc3bdeb84e6d00d4e491a349bba1dafff50e2fa5
jl2012
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2019
…e coverage in unit tests 4320623 tests: Add script checking for deterministic line coverage (practicalswift) Pull request description: Add script checking for deterministic line coverage in unit tests. Context: bitcoin#14343 ("coverage reports non-deterministic") When the coverage is deterministic this script can be invoked from Travis to guard against regressions, but left inactive for now. Output in case of determinism: ``` $ contrib/test_deterministic_coverage.sh 2 [2019-01-30 20:08:46] Measuring coverage, run #1 of 2 [2019-01-30 20:10:45] Measuring coverage, run #2 of 2 Coverage test passed: Deterministic coverage across 2 runs. ``` Output in case of non-determinism: ``` $ contrib/test_deterministic_coverage.sh 2 [2019-01-30 20:08:46] Measuring coverage, run #1 of 2 [2019-01-30 20:10:45] Measuring coverage, run #2 of 2 The line coverage is non-deterministic between runs. The test suite must be deterministic in the sense that the set of lines executed at least once must be identical between runs. This is a neccessary condition for meaningful coverage measuring. --- gcovr.run-1.txt 2019-01-30 23:14:07.419418694 +0100 +++ gcovr.run-2.txt 2019-01-30 23:15:57.998811282 +0100 @@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ test/crypto_tests.cpp 270 270 100% test/cuckoocache_tests.cpp 142 142 100% test/dbwrapper_tests.cpp 148 148 100% -test/denialofservice_tests.cpp 225 225 100% +test/denialofservice_tests.cpp 225 224 99% 363 test/descriptor_tests.cpp 116 116 100% test/fs_tests.cpp 24 3 12% 14,16-17,19-20,23,25-26,29,31-32,35-36,39,41-42,45-46,49,51-52 test/getarg_tests.cpp 111 111 100% @@ -585,5 +585,5 @@ zmq/zmqpublishnotifier.h 5 0 0% 12,31,37,43,49 zmq/zmqrpc.cpp 21 0 0% 16,18,20,22,33-35,38-45,49,52,56,60,62-63 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -TOTAL 61561 27606 44% +TOTAL 61561 27605 44% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ``` In this case line 363 of `test/denialofservice_tests.cpp` was executed only in the second run. Non-determinism detected! Tree-SHA512: 03f45590e70a87146f89aa7838beeff0925d7fd303697ff03e0e69f8a5861694be5f0dd10cb0020e3e3d40c9cf662f71dfcd838f6affb31bd5212314e0a4e3a9
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.