fix: issue 4358 prevent infinite cycles with static imports#4359
fix: issue 4358 prevent infinite cycles with static imports#4359jlerbsc merged 1 commit intojavaparser:masterfrom kdunee:4358-fix-static-import-cycle
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #4359 +/- ##
=============================================
+ Coverage 51.853% 51.860% +0.007%
=============================================
Files 497 497
Lines 28326 28326
Branches 4916 4916
=============================================
+ Hits 14688 14690 +2
+ Misses 11597 11595 -2
Partials 2041 2041
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. see 1 file with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
| .setSymbolResolver(new JavaSymbolSolver(cts)); | ||
| StaticJavaParser.setConfiguration(pc); | ||
| CompilationUnit cu = StaticJavaParser.parse(issueResourcesPath.resolve("foo/A.java")); | ||
| cu.findAll(MethodCallExpr.class).forEach(MethodCallExpr::resolve); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can't we check the result because there's only one method call?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'll accept this solution because it doesn't break the existing tests.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@jlerbsc The result is irrelevant, the test verifies that StackOverflowError isn't thrown during resolve. I considered adding a comment explaining it or explicitly using assertDoesNotThrow to make it more clear.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Does this mean that the method is not correctly solved?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It is correctly solved 😉. I could add the assertions to make it clear that:
- The method is correctly solved.
StackOverflowErrorisn't thrown.
Should I do that?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Checking that the method is correctly resolved is sufficient. If we want to find the context, we can refer to the issue.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sounds good to me.
Thanks for reviewing the change. I'll let you know when I implement the assertion, can't do it right now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As soon as it's done, I'll validate the PR. Thank you for your contribution.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@jlerbsc Done. I also rebased my change onto current master.
2 participants
Fixes #4358 (infinite loop when
import staticis used between an ancestor and parent class).