Skip to content

Fix Apache License naming as requested by issue #673.#674

Merged
bhamail merged 9 commits intojava-native-access:masterfrom
bhamail:ApacheLicense-naming
Jul 5, 2016
Merged

Fix Apache License naming as requested by issue #673.#674
bhamail merged 9 commits intojava-native-access:masterfrom
bhamail:ApacheLicense-naming

Conversation

@bhamail
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bhamail bhamail commented Jun 30, 2016

No description provided.

Comment thread CHANGES.md Outdated
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
NOTE: as of JNA 4.0, JNA is now dual-licensed under LGPL and ASL (see LICENSE).
NOTE: as of JNA 4.0, JNA is now dual-licensed under LGPL and AL (see LICENSE).
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It would be better to use "AL 2.0" here

matthiasblaesing and others added 2 commits June 30, 2016 21:21
Without this modification the jnidispatch.dll (when built by MSVC) is
dynamicly linked against msvcr100.dll. This requires the corresponding
runtime libraries to be installed.

Closes: #636
@bhamail
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

bhamail commented Jun 30, 2016

Hopefully better now?

@sebbASF
Copy link
Copy Markdown

sebbASF commented Jul 1, 2016

Looks fine now, thanks!

@bhamail bhamail merged commit 3217e0e into java-native-access:master Jul 5, 2016
@bhamail bhamail deleted the ApacheLicense-naming branch July 5, 2016 21:55
mstyura pushed a commit to mstyura/jna that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants