Skip to content

postgres - feat: adding in table of contents#1856

Merged
jaredwray merged 4 commits intomainfrom
postgres---feat-adding-in-table-of-contents
Feb 22, 2026
Merged

postgres - feat: adding in table of contents#1856
jaredwray merged 4 commits intomainfrom
postgres---feat-adding-in-table-of-contents

Conversation

@jaredwray
Copy link
Owner

@jaredwray jaredwray commented Feb 22, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

  • Followed the Contributing and Code of Conduct guidelines.
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes/features) with 100% code coverage.

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
postgres - feat: adding in table of contents

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

gemini-code-assist bot commented Feb 22, 2026

Summary of Changes

Hello @jaredwray, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request enhances the readability and navigability of the storage/postgres/README.md by introducing a comprehensive Table of Contents. This change allows users to quickly jump to relevant sections, improving the overall documentation experience for the PostgreSQL storage adapter.

Highlights

  • Documentation Structure: A new "Table of Contents" section has been introduced in the storage/postgres/README.md file to improve navigation.
  • Heading Levels: Existing top-level headings within the README.md were promoted from H2 to H1 to maintain proper document hierarchy after the addition of the new H2 "Table of Contents" section.
Changelog
  • storage/postgres/README.md
    • Added a "Table of Contents" section.
    • Included links to all major sections within the new Table of Contents.
    • Updated main section headings from H2 to H1 for better structural organization.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

gemini-code-assist[bot]
gemini-code-assist bot reviewed Feb 22, 2026
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds a Table of Contents to the README.md for the postgres storage adapter, which is a great improvement for navigation. My review focuses on an issue with the heading levels. Several section headings were changed from level 2 (##) to level 1 (#), which is semantically incorrect and creates an inconsistent document structure. I've provided suggestions to change these back to level 2 headings to maintain a proper document hierarchy.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 22, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.95%. Comparing base (5bd9166) to head (9f47227).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1856   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.95%   99.95%           
=======================================
  Files          32       32           
  Lines        2434     2434           
  Branches      440      440           
=======================================
  Hits         2433     2433           
  Misses          1        1

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@jaredwray jaredwray merged commit fba5d8c into main Feb 22, 2026
8 checks passed
@jaredwray jaredwray deleted the postgres---feat-adding-in-table-of-contents branch February 22, 2026 02:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

1 more reviewer

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist[bot] gemini-code-assist[bot] left review comments

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@jaredwray