Skip to content

mono - fix: tsconfig moving to esnext#1840

Merged
jaredwray merged 2 commits intomainfrom
mono---fix-tsconfig-moving-to-esnext
Feb 12, 2026
Merged

mono - fix: tsconfig moving to esnext#1840
jaredwray merged 2 commits intomainfrom
mono---fix-tsconfig-moving-to-esnext

Conversation

@jaredwray
Copy link
Owner

@jaredwray jaredwray commented Feb 12, 2026

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

  • Followed the Contributing and Code of Conduct guidelines.
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes/features) with 100% code coverage.

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
mono - fix: tsconfig moving to esnext

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @jaredwray, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request modernizes the TypeScript configuration by updating the compilation target and module resolution settings. The changes aim to leverage newer JavaScript features and align the project's module handling with contemporary Node.js practices, improving compatibility and development experience within the mono-repository.

Highlights

  • TypeScript Target Update: The TypeScript compilation target has been upgraded from es5 to ES2022, allowing for the use of more modern JavaScript features without transpilation.
  • Module System Modernization: The module system has been updated from commonjs to NodeNext, and moduleResolution has been explicitly set to NodeNext. This aligns the project with modern Node.js module resolution standards, supporting ECMAScript modules (ESM) more effectively.
Changelog
  • tsconfig.json
    • Updated target from es5 to ES2022
    • Updated module from commonjs to NodeNext
    • Added moduleResolution and set it to NodeNext
Activity
  • No activity has occurred on this pull request since its creation.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the TypeScript configuration to target ES2022 and use NodeNext for module resolution, effectively migrating the monorepo to use native ES Modules. While these are good steps for modernization, the changes have significant implications. My review highlights the major breaking change of switching to ES Modules, which likely requires corresponding code changes across all packages. I have also recommended specifying the minimum required Node.js version in package.json to reflect the new ES2022 compilation target and prevent runtime issues for users.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 12, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (80f9b88) to head (1bbfec6).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #1840   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           32        32           
  Lines         2434      2434           
  Branches       446       446           
=========================================
  Hits          2434      2434           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@jaredwray jaredwray merged commit cf392fb into main Feb 12, 2026
10 checks passed
@jaredwray jaredwray deleted the mono---fix-tsconfig-moving-to-esnext branch February 12, 2026 04:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant