Skip to content

compress-brotli - chore: upgrading vitest to 4.0.18#1830

Merged
jaredwray merged 2 commits intomainfrom
compress-brotli---chore-upgrading-vitest-to-4.0.18
Feb 3, 2026
Merged

compress-brotli - chore: upgrading vitest to 4.0.18#1830
jaredwray merged 2 commits intomainfrom
compress-brotli---chore-upgrading-vitest-to-4.0.18

Conversation

@jaredwray
Copy link
Owner

@jaredwray jaredwray commented Feb 3, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

  • Followed the Contributing and Code of Conduct guidelines.
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes/features) with 100% code coverage.

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
compress-brotli - chore: upgrading vitest to 4.0.18

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

gemini-code-assist bot commented Feb 3, 2026

Summary of Changes

Hello @jaredwray, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on routine maintenance by updating several development dependencies within the compress-brotli package. The primary objective is to ensure the project utilizes the latest stable versions of its testing framework and code quality tools, thereby benefiting from recent bug fixes, performance enhancements, and new features without introducing breaking changes.

Highlights

  • Dependency Upgrades: Upgraded the vitest testing framework from version ^4.0.14 to ^4.0.18 in the compress-brotli package.
  • Development Tool Updates: Updated the @vitest/coverage-v8 package, which provides coverage reporting for Vitest, from ^4.0.14 to ^4.0.18.
  • Linter/Formatter Update: Updated the @biomejs/biome tool, used for linting and formatting, from ^2.3.8 to ^2.3.13.
Changelog
  • packages/compress-brotli/package.json
    • Updated vitest from ^4.0.14 to ^4.0.18.
    • Updated @vitest/coverage-v8 from ^4.0.14 to ^4.0.18.
    • Updated @biomejs/biome from ^2.3.8 to ^2.3.13.
Activity
  • The pull request was created by jaredwray.
  • The author has confirmed adherence to contributing guidelines and code of conduct.
  • The author has confirmed that tests for the changes have been added with 100% code coverage.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

gemini-code-assist[bot]
gemini-code-assist bot reviewed Feb 3, 2026
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates several development dependencies in the compress-brotli package, including vitest, @vitest/coverage-v8, and @biomejs/biome. The changes align the versions of these dependencies with those specified in the root package.json, which is good practice for maintaining consistency in a monorepo. The changes are straightforward and look good. I see no issues with this update.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 3, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (0f7ece7) to head (1758fd3).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #1830   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           32        32           
  Lines         2430      2430           
  Branches       443       443           
=========================================
  Hits          2430      2430

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@jaredwray jaredwray merged commit c494ad2 into main Feb 3, 2026
10 checks passed
@jaredwray jaredwray deleted the compress-brotli---chore-upgrading-vitest-to-4.0.18 branch February 3, 2026 17:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

1 more reviewer

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist[bot] gemini-code-assist[bot] left review comments

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@jaredwray