Skip to content

mysql - chore: upgrading vitest to 4.0.17#1809

Merged
jaredwray merged 1 commit intomainfrom
mysql---chore-upgrading-vitest-to-4.0.17
Jan 20, 2026
Merged

mysql - chore: upgrading vitest to 4.0.17#1809
jaredwray merged 1 commit intomainfrom
mysql---chore-upgrading-vitest-to-4.0.17

Conversation

@jaredwray
Copy link
Owner

@jaredwray jaredwray commented Jan 20, 2026

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

  • Followed the Contributing and Code of Conduct guidelines.
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes/features) with 100% code coverage.

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
mysql - chore: upgrading vitest to 4.0.17

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @jaredwray, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on maintaining the project's development environment by updating several key development dependencies within the packages/mysql module. The primary goal is to ensure the project benefits from the latest features, bug fixes, and performance improvements offered by newer versions of the testing framework, its coverage plugin, and the code quality tool.

Highlights

  • Dependency Updates: The vitest testing framework has been upgraded from version 4.0.15 to 4.0.17.
  • Coverage Tool Update: The @vitest/coverage-v8 package, which provides V8 code coverage for Vitest, has been updated from 4.0.15 to 4.0.17.
  • Linter/Formatter Update: The @biomejs/biome tool, used for linting and formatting, has been updated from 2.3.9 to 2.3.11.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request upgrades several development dependencies in the mysql package, including vitest and @biomejs/biome. While keeping dependencies up-to-date is a good practice, this change introduces version inconsistencies for these tools across the monorepo. For example, the root package.json and the keyv package still use older versions. To maintain a healthy and predictable development environment, it's recommended to synchronize these dependency versions across all packages. I've left a specific comment regarding this. As a minor note, the PR title could be updated to reflect that @biomejs/biome was also upgraded for better clarity.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 20, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (6343e7a) to head (590edcb).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #1809   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           32        32           
  Lines         2402      2402           
  Branches       436       436           
=========================================
  Hits          2402      2402           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@jaredwray jaredwray merged commit c33be83 into main Jan 20, 2026
10 checks passed
@jaredwray jaredwray deleted the mysql---chore-upgrading-vitest-to-4.0.17 branch January 20, 2026 16:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant