Skip to content

Comments

Enhancement of Sound-Devices.md #136#169

Closed
gegeweb wants to merge 8 commits intojamulussoftware:changesfrom
gegeweb:changes-sound-devices
Closed

Enhancement of Sound-Devices.md #136#169
gegeweb wants to merge 8 commits intojamulussoftware:changesfrom
gegeweb:changes-sound-devices

Conversation

@gegeweb
Copy link
Contributor

@gegeweb gegeweb commented Dec 10, 2020

No description provided.

@gegeweb gegeweb marked this pull request as draft December 10, 2020 07:48
@ann0see
Copy link
Member

ann0see commented Dec 10, 2020

Thanks @gegeweb! The site is much more structured now. Besides that: could you please remove the french translation and re-submit it once this site goes live? This allows us to have a clear diff for translators.

Furthermore, I think we should indeed add a few statements to the Getting-Started page which says that a device must support 48000Hz Sampling rate and on Windows it's recommended to chose a device with a native ASIO-driver.

Copy link
Member

@ann0see ann0see left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just some comments

_**Note**: depends on how the device works on your system (Linux, MacOS, Windows, etc.)_.

### Known to Work with Jamulus
You can update it with the information you have. **Please indicate the platform(s) you are using!**.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are you sure that we want this here? Wouldn't it be better in the upcoming knowledge base? But it would spread information.

Furthermore the user wouldn't know how to add anything

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know what si the best to have information from the users. Comunity page? Issue? Forum?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd suggest to get the information via the forum (but we could also use an issue here)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, we link to the forum?
Or we remove this sentence?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd suggest to add a link to the forum. But let's wait for some other comments.

@gegeweb
Copy link
Contributor Author

gegeweb commented Dec 10, 2020

Furthermore, I think we should indeed add a few statements to the Getting-Started page which says that a device must support 48000Hz Sampling rate and on Windows it's recommended to chose a device with a native ASIO-driver.

Yes, I aggree.

@gegeweb gegeweb changed the title [en][fr] Enhancement of Sound-Devices.md #136 Enhancement of Sound-Devices.md #136 Dec 10, 2020
@ann0see
Copy link
Member

ann0see commented Dec 21, 2020

@gegeweb @gilgongo
There is still one open question:

Should we move this to the Knowledge base or should it stay part of the wiki?

@ann0see ann0see marked this pull request as ready for review December 29, 2020 21:38
@gilgongo
Copy link
Member

Should we move this to the Knowledge base

My own opinion is that since I would expect a list of devices to be infinitely long and require constant updating, then maintaining that is a job for "community" really. In contrast, anything we put on the "official" site we commit to being as accurate as possible.

But from an SEO point of view it doesn't matter :-)

@trebmuh
Copy link
Member

trebmuh commented Jan 1, 2021

My opinion is that this page should be on the Community database since it'd require a very big amount of time to make it a high level of trustiness for the reader. Better to put it on the community database with a kind of disclaimer like the following:

This is a list of sound devices experience which have been reported by users. Feel free to add your experience and thus increase common knowledge by sharing yours here

@ann0see
Copy link
Member

ann0see commented Jan 2, 2021

Ok. So do we all agree that this file should be part of the KB then?

@trebmuh
Copy link
Member

trebmuh commented Jan 2, 2021

Ok. So do we all agree that this file should be part of the KB then?

I'd say that we should keep some sort of general guidelines in the manual (ie: use a soundcard supporting 48khz, ...etc) and we should put the user experiences feedback (ie: "I'm using the HIGH-PRO-AUDIO model VERY-NICE-MK2 on Linux Tribichi version 10.2.354 with a 5.9.0 low latency kernel with success") on the Community Knowledge Database.

@ann0see
Copy link
Member

ann0see commented Jan 2, 2021

I'd say that we should keep some sort of general guidelines in the manual

Have a look at the getting started md file on changes. There's some generic information now. We can also add it to the manual, if you like.

@trebmuh
Copy link
Member

trebmuh commented Jan 2, 2021

That looks perfect as it is on change's Getting-Started.md
So, I'm all greenlighting sound-devices.md to be moved to the "Community Knowledge Database" section.

@ann0see ann0see self-assigned this Jan 4, 2021
@ann0see
Copy link
Member

ann0see commented Jan 5, 2021

I've now moved it to the knowledge base.

@ann0see ann0see closed this Jan 5, 2021
@ann0see
Copy link
Member

ann0see commented Jan 5, 2021

I've now restructured the page even more. I'm not yet totally ok with the layout and style, but it works.

@ann0see
Copy link
Member

ann0see commented Jan 5, 2021

We might use

<details markdown="1">
<summary markdown="1">

https://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_details.asp

To clarify the page structure.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants