Add a CONTRIBUTING file to clarify contribution process#604
Merged
corrados merged 2 commits intojamulussoftware:masterfrom Sep 20, 2020
Merged
Add a CONTRIBUTING file to clarify contribution process#604corrados merged 2 commits intojamulussoftware:masterfrom
corrados merged 2 commits intojamulussoftware:masterfrom
Conversation
ann0see
changed the title
trebmuh
reviewed
Sep 19, 2020
trebmuh
reviewed
Sep 19, 2020
trebmuh
reviewed
Sep 19, 2020
Contributor
|
As you further reduced the README size, I will now put the CONTRIBUTING content in that README file. |
Member
Author
|
Better link it. A contributing file is automatically shown on each PR. |
Contributor
|
Oh, I did not know that. Hmm, too late. I already commited my change. You were 10 seconds too late ;-). |
Member
Author
Contributor
|
Ok, it should be fixed now. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As proposed in #596 (comment)