Skip to content

Multiple patterns in exhaustive switch not seen as totally covered #1999

@NolwennD

Description

@NolwennD

Steps to reproduce

  • JaCoCo version: 0.8.14
  • Java 25
  • Operating system: Linux Ubuntu
  • Tool integration: Maven

In the following example, letter method is not seen as totally covered.

public sealed interface Coverage {
  record A() implements Coverage {}
  record B() implements Coverage {}
  record C() implements Coverage {}

  default String letter(){
    return switch (this){
      case A _ -> "A";
      case B _, C _ -> "Z";
    };
  }

  default String name(){
    return switch (this){
      case A _ -> "record A";
      case B _ -> "not record A";
      case C _ -> "not record A";
    };
  }
}
class CoverageTest {
  @Test
  void shouldBeAForA(){
    assertThat(new Coverage.A().letter()).isEqualTo("A");
  }
  @Test
  void shouldBeZForB(){
    assertThat(new Coverage.B().letter()).isEqualTo("Z");
  }
  @Test
  void shouldBeZForC(){
    assertThat(new Coverage.C().letter()).isEqualTo("Z");
  }
  @Test
  void shouldBeRecordAForA(){
    assertThat(new Coverage.A().name()).isEqualTo("record A");
  }
  @Test
  void shouldNotBeRecordAForB(){
    assertThat(new Coverage.B().name()).isEqualTo("not record A");
  }
  @Test
  void shouldNotBeRecordAForC(){
    assertThat(new Coverage.C().name()).isEqualTo("not record A");
  }
}
Image

Expected behaviour

100% coverage for all methods.

Actual behaviour

Missing 1 of 4 branches for letter method

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    Status

    Awaiting triage

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions