Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.88%. Comparing base (c65c362) to head (3b40ff3).

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #164   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.88%   88.88%           
=======================================
  Files           3        3           
  Lines         360      360           
=======================================
  Hits          320      320           
  Misses         40       40           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

/CC @usidedown does this work for you?

pip install "git+https://github.com/iterative/shtab.git@double-dash#egg=shtab"

Awesome, thanks for the quick response!

I'm getting a slight weirdness.

Here's my example:

import argparse

def get_parser():
    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
    parser.add_argument('--opt1', choices=['a','b'])
    parser.add_argument('pos1', type=int, choices=list(range(8)))
    parser.add_argument('pos2', type=int, choices=list(range(4)))
    parser.add_argument('pos3', type=int, choices=list(range(2)))
    return parser


def main():
    parser = get_parser()
    print(parser.parse_args())

if __name__ == '__main__':
    main()

my completion commandline:

eval "$(shtab src.test.get_parser --prog=foo --shell=bash)"

If I do the regular

foo 6 4 <tab>

I get 0 1 choices as expected.
But if I do

foo -- 6 4 <tab>

I get 0 1 2 3 completions

try now?

try now?

Looks good!
Even managed to complete a file starting with - (not possible without --)