Conversation
The goal is to stop doing two allocations for each block (now it will only allocate the `[]byte` buffer, and pass the `cid.Cid, []byte` pair by decomposed registers or stack). This way of changing does not change the syntax for trivial uses of block.Block, so in theory we will have to update only producers of block.Block, not consumers. Fixes #57
2 tasks
Jorropo
added a commit
to ipfs/go-block-format
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 3, 2023
Jorropo
added a commit
to ipfs/go-block-format
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 3, 2023
Contributor
Author
gammazero
added a commit
to ipfs/go-block-format
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 6, 2024
The goal is to stop doing two allocations for each block (now it will only allocate the []byte buffer, and pass the cid.Cid, []byte pair by decomposed registers or stack). This way of changing does not change the syntax for trivial uses of block.Block, so in theory we will have to update only producers of block.Block, not consumers. Fixes #45 Replaces ipfs/boxo#192 Note: This change will cause a failure here: https://github.com/ipfs/go-ipld-format/blob/0f7aff00f72e9dea0d9718bc0972e309ba7c3e8d/format.go#L27
Contributor
|
Replaced by ipfs/go-block-format#53 |
gammazero
added a commit
to ipfs/go-block-format
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2025
The goal is to stop doing two allocations for each block (now it will only allocate the []byte buffer, and pass the cid.Cid, []byte pair by decomposed registers or stack). This way of changing does not change the syntax for trivial uses of block.Block, so in theory we will have to update only producers of block.Block, not consumers. Fixes #45 Replaces ipfs/boxo#192 Note: This change will cause a failure here: https://github.com/ipfs/go-ipld-format/blob/0f7aff00f72e9dea0d9718bc0972e309ba7c3e8d/format.go#L27
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The goal is to stop doing two allocations for each block (now it will only allocate the
[]bytebuffer, and pass thecid.Cid, []bytepair by decomposed registers or stack).This way of changing does not change the syntax for trivial uses of block.Block, so in theory we will have to update only producers of block.Block, not consumers.
Fixes ipfs/go-block-format#45