Skip to content

frontend JSON viewer #1974

Merged
drosetti merged 4 commits intodevelopfrom
raw_data
Oct 31, 2023
Merged

frontend JSON viewer #1974
drosetti merged 4 commits intodevelopfrom
raw_data

Conversation

@carellamartina
Copy link
Contributor

@carellamartina carellamartina commented Oct 31, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Description

adjusted frontend json viewer: replaced NewJsonRenderer from certego-ui library with react-json-tree library

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue).
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality).
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected).

Checklist

  • I have read and understood the rules about how to Contribute to this project
  • The pull request is for the branch develop
  • A new plugin (analyzer, connector, visualizer, playbook or ingestor) was added or changed, in which case:
    • Usage file was updated.
    • Advanced-Usage was updated (in case the plugin provides additional optional configuration).
    • If the plugin requires mocked testing, _monkeypatch() was used in its class to apply the necessary decorators.
    • If a File analyzer was added and it supports a mimetype which is not already supported, you added a sample of that type inside the archive test_files.zip and you added the default tests for that mimetype in test_classes.py.
    • If you created a new analyzer and it is free (does not require API keys), please add it in the FREE_TO_USE_ANALYZERS playbook in playbook_config.json.
    • Check if it could make sense to add that analyzer/connector to other freely available playbooks.
    • I have provided the resulting raw JSON of a finished analysis and a screenshot of the results.
  • If external libraries/packages with restrictive licenses were used, they were added in the Legal Notice section.
  • Linters (Black, Flake, Isort) gave 0 errors. If you have correctly installed pre-commit, it does these checks and adjustments on your behalf.
  • I have added tests for the feature/bug I solved (see tests folder). All the tests (new and old ones) gave 0 errors.
  • If changes were made to an existing model/serializer/view, the docs were updated and regenerated (check CONTRIBUTE.md).
  • If the GUI has been modified:
    • I have a provided a screenshot of the result in the PR.
    • I have created new frontend tests for the new component or updated existing ones.

Important Rules

  • If you miss to compile the Checklist properly, your PR won't be reviewed by the maintainers.
  • If your changes decrease the overall tests coverage (you will know after the Codecov CI job is done), you should add the required tests to fix the problem
  • Everytime you make changes to the PR and you think the work is done, you should explicitly ask for a review. After being reviewed and received a "change request", you should explicitly ask for a review again once you have made the requested changes.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 31, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #1974 (7218541) into develop (aa8820f) will increase coverage by 9.31%.
Report is 1485 commits behind head on develop.
The diff coverage is 75.66%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1974      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    66.75%   76.06%   +9.31%     
===========================================
  Files           95      446     +351     
  Lines         3706    13639    +9933     
  Branches       519     1421     +902     
===========================================
+ Hits          2474    10375    +7901     
- Misses         941     2700    +1759     
- Partials       291      564     +273
Files Coverage Δ
api_app/analyzers_manager/admin.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
api_app/analyzers_manager/apps.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
api_app/analyzers_manager/constants.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
api_app/analyzers_manager/exceptions.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...app/analyzers_manager/file_analyzers/boxjs_scan.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...pi_app/analyzers_manager/file_analyzers/onenote.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...pi_app/analyzers_manager/file_analyzers/peframe.py 82.35% <100.00%> (ø)
...i_app/analyzers_manager/file_analyzers/rtf_info.py 64.86% <100.00%> (ø)
...s_manager/file_analyzers/xlm_macro_deobfuscator.py 62.50% <100.00%> (ø)
api_app/analyzers_manager/filters.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 232 more

... and 259 files with indirect coverage changes

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 64fc894...7218541. Read the comment docs.

@drosetti drosetti merged commit 309b705 into develop Oct 31, 2023
@drosetti drosetti deleted the raw_data branch October 31, 2023 17:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@drosetti drosetti drosetti approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@carellamartina @drosetti