Skip to content

enable/disable playbook for org#1965

Merged
drosetti merged 7 commits intodevelopfrom
org_playbook
Oct 26, 2023
Merged

enable/disable playbook for org#1965
drosetti merged 7 commits intodevelopfrom
org_playbook

Conversation

@carellamartina
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Owner/admin can enable/disable custom playbook for the org

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue).
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality).
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected).

Checklist

  • I have read and understood the rules about how to Contribute to this project
  • The pull request is for the branch develop
  • A new plugin (analyzer, connector, visualizer, playbook or ingestor) was added or changed, in which case:
    • Usage file was updated.
    • Advanced-Usage was updated (in case the plugin provides additional optional configuration).
    • If the plugin requires mocked testing, _monkeypatch() was used in its class to apply the necessary decorators.
    • If a File analyzer was added and it supports a mimetype which is not already supported, you added a sample of that type inside the archive test_files.zip and you added the default tests for that mimetype in test_classes.py.
    • If you created a new analyzer and it is free (does not require API keys), please add it in the FREE_TO_USE_ANALYZERS playbook in playbook_config.json.
    • Check if it could make sense to add that analyzer/connector to other freely available playbooks.
    • I have provided the resulting raw JSON of a finished analysis and a screenshot of the results.
  • If external libraries/packages with restrictive licenses were used, they were added in the Legal Notice section.
  • Linters (Black, Flake, Isort) gave 0 errors. If you have correctly installed pre-commit, it does these checks and adjustments on your behalf.
  • I have added tests for the feature/bug I solved (see tests folder). All the tests (new and old ones) gave 0 errors.
  • If changes were made to an existing model/serializer/view, the docs were updated and regenerated (check CONTRIBUTE.md).
  • If the GUI has been modified:
    • I have a provided a screenshot of the result in the PR.
    • I have created new frontend tests for the new component or updated existing ones.

Important Rules

  • If you miss to compile the Checklist properly, your PR won't be reviewed by the maintainers.
  • If your changes decrease the overall tests coverage (you will know after the Codecov CI job is done), you should add the required tests to fix the problem
  • Everytime you make changes to the PR and you think the work is done, you should explicitly ask for a review. After being reviewed and received a "change request", you should explicitly ask for a review again once you have made the requested changes.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 25, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #1965 (36b4b31) into develop (46d5774) will increase coverage by 0.19%.
Report is 19 commits behind head on develop.
The diff coverage is 75.00%.

❗ Current head 36b4b31 differs from pull request most recent head 12cd1b5. Consider uploading reports for the commit 12cd1b5 to get more accurate results

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1965      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    75.81%   76.01%   +0.19%     
===========================================
  Files          441      447       +6     
  Lines        13559    13705     +146     
  Branches      1418     1435      +17     
===========================================
+ Hits         10280    10418     +138     
  Misses        2712     2712              
- Partials       567      575       +8     
Files Coverage Δ
api_app/serializers.py 86.28% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
api_app/views.py 84.45% <0.00%> (-0.22%) ⬇️

... and 26 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 46d5774...12cd1b5. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@drosetti drosetti left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very good! Just some changes:

  • See DeepSource suggestion
  • I think in case we do a rebase we can avoid the double check in the frontend because owner is also and admin
  • There is a little bug in the plugins -> playbook section: in case via Django admin a playbook is marked as disable for the org, but the "disabled" flag is not checked, the playbook is show as active with the green icon for the org memebers, I suggest to make it disactive as for the disabled playbook. In the start scan the playbook disabled for the orgs are correctly filtered.

@drosetti drosetti merged commit 90903fd into develop Oct 26, 2023
@drosetti drosetti deleted the org_playbook branch October 26, 2023 15:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants