Skip to content

Conversation

@ThiefMaster
Copy link
Member

While not technically static site archives, these files are much closer to static site archives than to normal materials/attachments.

Using that storage (which for most people is the same one anyway) has the advantage that, just like for static site archives which are also temporary, these material packages can now go to a storage backend that is e.g. excluded from backups.

While not technically static site archives, these files are much closer
to static site archives than to normal materials/attachments.

Using that storage (which for most people is the same one anyway) has
the advantage that, just like for static site archives which are also
temporary, these material packages can now go to a storage backend that
is e.g. excluded from backups.
@ThiefMaster ThiefMaster added this to the v3.3 milestone May 21, 2025
@ThiefMaster ThiefMaster merged commit e139f3b into indico:master May 21, 2025
10 checks passed
@ThiefMaster ThiefMaster deleted the attachment-package-backend branch May 21, 2025 10:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant