This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 5, 2025. It is now read-only.
Merged
Conversation
I think this fixes issue eventmachine#441. 8b613d0 changed the `select` timeout to zero in the case where NumCloseScheduled > 0. It seems that in certain circumstances (for example, if `close_connection` is called in a connection's `unbind`) NumCloseScheduled would get incremented twice, but only decremented once, thus never again reaching zero for the lifetime of the reactor. The user-observed effect was that one CPU core would be pegged at 100%, because the zero `select` timeout caused us to go around the select loop without any pause. Changing it so that it is safe to ScheduleClose() multiple times seems like the cleanest solution to the problem.
Author
|
Thanks for merging! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See eventmachine#445. This fixes an issue that causes the EM reactor to spin in a tight loop, using 100% of one CPU core.