System Info
transformers version: 4.35.0
- Platform: Linux-5.16.19-76051619-generic-x86_64-with-glibc2.35
- Python version: 3.10.11
- Huggingface_hub version: 0.17.3
- Safetensors version: 0.3.1
- Accelerate version: 0.25.0
- Accelerate config: not found
- PyTorch version (GPU?): 2.3.0.dev20240104 (True)
- Tensorflow version (GPU?): not installed (NA)
- Flax version (CPU?/GPU?/TPU?): not installed (NA)
- Jax version: not installed
- JaxLib version: not installed
- Using GPU in script?: Yes
- Using distributed or parallel set-up in script?: No
The Problem
The Pythia models, and by extension the GPTNeoXForCausalLM implementation don't appear to be working correctly in 4.35. I've attached a simple reproduction snippet below. This code works on 4.34, but produces NaNs on 4.35 during the forward pass. The token ids are not particularly anomalous.
The problem is likely related to the report at #28316, but this issue shows that any effects on reward modeling might be 2nd-order effects and that changes between 4.34 and 4.35 are the problem.
@ArthurZucker @younesbelkada
Reproduction
import torch
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLM
model_name_or_path = "EleutherAI/pythia-70m"
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_name_or_path, torch_dtype=torch.float16)
input_ids = [29, 93, 303, 64, 5478, 49651, 10394, 187, 34, 12939, 875] # this is '<|im_start|>system\nA chat between'
# alternative: tokenizer('<|im_start|>system\nA chat between')
input_ids = torch.as_tensor(input_ids)[None]
model.cuda()
input_ids = input_ids.cuda()
model(input_ids)["logits"] # has NaNs?
Expected behavior
Normal forward pass, without NaNs.
System Info
transformersversion: 4.35.0The Problem
The Pythia models, and by extension the
GPTNeoXForCausalLMimplementation don't appear to be working correctly in 4.35. I've attached a simple reproduction snippet below. This code works on 4.34, but produces NaNs on 4.35 during the forward pass. The token ids are not particularly anomalous.The problem is likely related to the report at #28316, but this issue shows that any effects on reward modeling might be 2nd-order effects and that changes between 4.34 and 4.35 are the problem.
@ArthurZucker @younesbelkada
Reproduction
Expected behavior
Normal forward pass, without NaNs.