Gligen training #7906
Merged
Gligen training #7906
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
|
Thanks for your awesome contributions! Will merge once the CI is green <3 |
Member
|
Hi @Hzzone could you fix the code quality tests? |
|
The docs for this PR live here. All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update. |
Contributor
Author
|
Hi @sayakpaul |
Member
|
Thanks a lot for your contributions! |
sayakpaul
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 23, 2024
* add training code of gligen * fix code quality tests. --------- Co-authored-by: Sayak Paul <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Training GLIGEN Like ControlNet
This PR implements the training code of GLIGEN including making training data, training, and testing. One can use the trained model without any change of diffusers. The original issue has been discussed in issues/7368.
Before submitting
documentation guidelines, and
here are tips on formatting docstrings.
Who can review?
This PR is opened according to the discussion with @sayakpaul.
Anyone in the community is free to review the PR once the tests have passed. Feel free to tag
members/contributors who may be interested in your PR.