@jowharshamshiri and other dear collaborators, please provide me with you feedbacks on this PR.

Part 1:

✅
Refer to the glossary on the use of the huggingface emoji.

✅
Library names are not brand names, nor are they concepts, so no need to transliterate. They are shorter namespaces so just use the English form. For example we will transliterate 'Tokenizer' when it is used to indicate a concept but not when it is the name of a library.

❓ ( I used Fine-tune)
I don't think we should transliterate the word Fine-tune.

❓ (I used دمو)
I don't think we should transliterate the word Demo.

✅
also for lists separately. They render in LTR with the current version of Huggingface docs if you don't do this and the preview will look ugly. Refer to our previously submitted pages.

❓ (I have translated AGI as هوش جامع مصنوعی, this is what persian wikipedia also refers to)
I defer to our new collaborators on whether we need to add context info about AGI. That info is always a google search away and the hard and fast rule is to not include ANY new contextual info. Refer to point no. 9 in the notes on translating at the bottom of the glossary. I'll soon be moving those out to a text file, per your suggestion.

❓ (I can't really get what he means by robot immortality, maybe I can use حضور جاودانه روبات‌ها در میان انسان‌ها)
I think when the text talks about "robot immortality" it doesn't mean that robots will become immortal--they already are. It's talking about humans and machines merging and humans achieving immortality through that. Also does scale up translate to the Persian "افزایش مقیاس"? Again I defer to our new collaborators.

✅
'اولین گام‌های آغازین' is redundant.

✅
A couple of uses of 'Yek' as a substitute for English indefinite articles.

❓
I don't think 'to democratize' translates well to the Persian "دموکراتیک کردن". The Persian has solely political connotations to me, but its use in the English text is not political at all. I defer to our new collaborators on a better equivalent.

✅ (changed it to نویسند‌‌ه‌ی مشترک)
Do we have هم-نویسنده‌ in Persian?

✅
I think your choice of تابع is better than the glossary's. Please include that update to the glossary in your PR.

✅ (I also prefer using transliterated versions, so I changed them.)
I defer to our new collaborators on whether we should transliterate encoder and decoder or use the Persian equivalents رمزنگار and رمزگشا. Do we know what is used in Persian textbooks? and do we like that?

Part 2

✅ (changed them all to پردازش زبان طبیعی)
Again hard-and-fast rule is not to expand the acronym NLP when the original text hasn't. There is some gray area here, as in the case of ML that we talk about in the glossary(Acronyms used for convenience in English). With some nuance I think expanding it into full Persian form is acceptable in some places in Page 2. If you choose to do that, please choose only one form, no need to include the acronym in ellipses.

✅ (In this case couldn't think of a better substitute)
Persian sentences follow the format Subject-Object-Verb. That means it is generally expected that the sentences end in a verb. Again there is a lot of gray area here and we need to apply nuance. But try to keep that in mind. For example maybe don't end sentences in "هستند یا نه". I say maybe bc if you do, that is your creative choice and I respect that.

✅ (I prefer دسته‌بندی and I think the glossary says دسته‌بندی too)
I propose the use of "تشخیص نوع" in place of "دسته‌بندی" in Page 2, the verb 'to classify' is not used as a technical term there

❓
Is "بیان کردن" our best equivalent for 'represent'?

✅
Chapter is فصل and section is بخش. The glossary is your friend. I'm sorry I had this in my local fork but have not finished Page 2 of Chapter 2 to submit a PR with a glossary update yet. I thought it was already in there. Forgive my assumption.