-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 90
stabilize upgrade in response #292
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
stabilize upgrade in response #292
Conversation
jbr
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks like cfg_unstable needs to be removed from src/utils/mod.rs for ci to pass, and we should check if we're actually using the unstable feature anywhere. if not, we should remove the feature
|
refs: #291 |
Fishrock123
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
#291 should come first but if we are stabilizing that then this goes hand-in-hand.
|
Oh, guess i had it backwards then 😅 |
yoshuawuyts
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you!
Hi @yoshuawuyts / @jbr, I start working in an example using websocket based on littoral and I found that some changes are needed in this branch
stabilize-upgradeto supportws.I tested ok in my example but let me know if something is wrong, thanks for the awesome job!!! 🙌