Skip to content

chore(codegen): resync cloud client from EF 354b4cf4 - #6608

Merged
jrusso1020 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
sync/hyperframes-codegen-354b4cf4
Oct 28, 2026
Merged

jrusso1020 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
sync/hyperframes-codegen-354b4cf4

Conversation

@heygen-rui-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Auto-generated PR: the HyperFrames cloud-render OpenAPI surface in experiment-framework changed. This PR regenerates the typed client in packages/cli/src/cloud/_gen/.

Generated by scripts/generate_hyperframes_cli_client.py.

Source commit: 354b4cf4404a44572c5a96685d2742e89f71dad7
Triggered by: https://github.com/heygen-com/experiment-framework/commit/354b4cf4404a44572c5a96685d2742e89f71dad7

@jrusso1020 jrusso1020 changed the title codegen: resync cloud client from EF 354b4cf4 chore(codegen): resync cloud client from EF 354b4cf4 Oct 28, 2026
The CLI already sends page_motion_blur (#6087), and experiment-framework adds
it to the public spec in a pending change. Keep it here so the sync does not
break the CLI typecheck in the meantime.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <[email protected]>

@jerrai-bot-heygen jerrai-bot-heygen left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed the final generated-client diff and retained request field against EF #59833. The net change is documentation only. The existing explicit page_motion_blur option remains a rollout dependency: the older API rejects the field until the compatible API is deployed; ordinary requests omit it. No live render or deployment verification. — Jerrai

@jrusso1020
jrusso1020 added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 28, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 32e171c Oct 28, 2026
67 checks passed
@jrusso1020
jrusso1020 deleted the sync/hyperframes-codegen-354b4cf4 branch October 28, 2026 05:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants