Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Oct 15, 2024. It is now read-only.

Deprecate this buildpack#7

Merged
ojacobson merged 4 commits intomasterfrom
readme-api
Mar 2, 2017
Merged

Deprecate this buildpack#7
ojacobson merged 4 commits intomasterfrom
readme-api

Conversation

@dzuelke
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dzuelke dzuelke commented Oct 9, 2015

That way the list of buildpacks gets exposed through the API, so it's easily visible to customers, support etc.

@dmathieu
Copy link
Copy Markdown

dmathieu commented Oct 9, 2015

Huge 👍

@tt
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

tt commented Oct 9, 2015

I don't think we should encourage forking a deprecated buildpack.

@dzuelke dzuelke changed the title Change README to use buildpacks:add only Deprecate this buildpack Oct 9, 2015
@dzuelke
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

dzuelke commented Oct 9, 2015

Deprecation notice added and README updated accordingly.

Comment thread README.md Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure you can add this line when our buildpack is a fork too.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was wondering the same, but given how the original author was a Heroku employee at that time, I figured it'd just be a clarification, not a change?!

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some contributors are not, though. I think it's easier to just remove that commit. It doesn't make much of a difference if we're going to deprecate it.

@craigkerstiens
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👍

@tt
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

tt commented Oct 9, 2015

Looks good to me.

@jkutner
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

jkutner commented Oct 12, 2015

@dzuelke lgtm. may i merge?

@dzuelke
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

dzuelke commented Oct 12, 2015

Go ahead!

On 12.10.2015, at 15:43, Joe Kutner [email protected] wrote:

@dzuelke lgtm. may i merge?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@owenthereal
Copy link
Copy Markdown

FYI, this buildpack may be still useful for a kernel app.

/cc @mikehale

@dzuelke
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

dzuelke commented Oct 27, 2015

Yeah we're just deprecating, not removing anytime soon (and most people are likely running off ddollar's repo anyway).

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ojacobson ojacobson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚢 🇮🇹

@dzuelke dzuelke mentioned this pull request Mar 2, 2017
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@dmathieu dmathieu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚀 🎈 💥

@ojacobson ojacobson merged commit 5d6c250 into master Mar 2, 2017
@ojacobson ojacobson deleted the readme-api branch March 2, 2017 00:41
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants