Rebrand to "Auditable workspaces for AI agents" across README and site#167
Conversation
Reposition the whole project around the auditable-workspace concept with h5i env as the canonical workspace. Retire "AI-aware version control". - README: new tagline, workspace definition + stack, five capabilities (h5i env first), "what h5i is/is not", refs/h5i/* reframed - Front page: hero/problem/solution/sandbox/FAQ/CTA + meta/OG/Twitter - Features/Workflows/Pitch: re-grouped around three pillars and the golden path; sandbox promoted to flagship - Blog: index re-grouped under four pillars, new cornerstone post "Why AI agents need auditable workspaces", all 28 posts reframed with cornerstone cross-link + CTA, sitemap updated
- Front page: reorder feature sections to the workspace lifecycle (h5i env first → commit → prompt maturity → capture run → msg → audit → share pr), tighten the Solution section and the h5i env copy, drop dead commented-out markup - Pitch: order the sandbox (env) slide before the provenance slide so the workspace precedes the records it produces - Blog index: give pillar headers a distinct look (large red index numeral, section divider) so they no longer read as post cards
Replace prose em-dashes with commas (and colons in headings/titles) across the README and all web pages for a cleaner, less AI-styled read. - Preserve numeric ranges (0–100), CLI flags (--foo), box-drawing diagrams (├─), and dashes inside code/terminal demos and JSON-LD - Keep the pitch comparison table's em-dash N/A cell markers - Update README heading anchors (and the badge/news/dashboard links that target them) to match the new colon-based heading slugs
🪙 36% AI-authored · 1 file · prompt 49/100
💬 The ask
📍 What shipped
Note 🪴 Prompt maturity: 49/100 · developing · 4 prompts scored (100% of AI commits) 📊 heuristic breakdown
Readability (display-only): Flesch 66 · FK grade 8.7 · Gunning Fog 11.5 Offline classical-NLP score — no LLM. Higher = more specific, bounded, and grounded prompting. Tip ✅ Security scan cleanNo credentials leaked in this branch's diff. h5i scanned every added line against the secret rule pack and found nothing to rotate. Note Duplicate-code scan clean — no copy-paste blocks introduced. 🧠 Reasoning by file — 6736 nodes across 2 lanes, latest 24 only%%{init: {"flowchart": {"nodeSpacing": 42, "rankSpacing": 48, "diagramPadding": 14}, "themeVariables": {"fontSize": "18px"}} }%%
flowchart TB
subgraph lane_0["📄 docs/pitch/index.html · 21 ops"]
direction LR
n_lane_0_0["EDIT"]:::a
n_lane_0_1["READ × 2"]:::o
n_lane_0_2["EDIT × 5"]:::a
n_lane_0_3["READ"]:::o
n_lane_0_4["EDIT"]:::a
n_lane_0_5["READ × 4"]:::o
n_lane_0_6["EDIT"]:::a
n_lane_0_7["READ"]:::o
n_lane_0_8["EDIT"]:::a
n_lane_0_9["READ"]:::o
n_lane_0_10["EDIT × 2"]:::a
n_lane_0_11["READ"]:::o
n_lane_0_0 --> n_lane_0_1
n_lane_0_1 --> n_lane_0_2
n_lane_0_2 --> n_lane_0_3
n_lane_0_3 --> n_lane_0_4
n_lane_0_4 --> n_lane_0_5
n_lane_0_5 --> n_lane_0_6
n_lane_0_6 --> n_lane_0_7
n_lane_0_7 --> n_lane_0_8
n_lane_0_8 --> n_lane_0_9
n_lane_0_9 --> n_lane_0_10
n_lane_0_10 --> n_lane_0_11
end
subgraph lane_1["🗂 Other · 3 nodes"]
direction LR
n_lane_1_0["READ · searched cockpit|Why for ”surface|reviewer's”"]:::o
n_lane_1_1["READ · searched sandbox|Git-native|PR-native|Offline|Audit-first|moat|Agents fo…"]:::o
n_lane_1_2["READ · searched docs/pitch/index.html for ”class=”slide'”"]:::o
n_lane_1_0 --> n_lane_1_1
n_lane_1_1 --> n_lane_1_2
end
classDef o fill:#dbeafe,stroke:#1e3a8a,color:#0b1c4a;
classDef t fill:#fef3c7,stroke:#92400e,color:#3f2d05;
classDef a fill:#dcfce7,stroke:#166534,color:#0a2e16;
classDef n fill:#ede9fe,stroke:#5b21b6,color:#221251;
classDef m fill:#e5e7eb,stroke:#374151,color:#0b0f17;
Note 🪙 Token reduction — 38 captured tool outputs kept out of context: 63396 → 28432 tokens (55% saved, 34964 tokens). Full output is recoverable with By tool
📜 Per-commit provenance
|
No description provided.