Never put read locks into lockSharedSessions and other minor changes #3315
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
exclusiveandforceLockEvenInMvccparameters are replaced with single parameter with possible valuesREAD_LOCK,WRITE_LOCK, andEXCLUSIVE_LOCK.MVTablenow handles read locks in consistent way. Previously these locks weren't included into map of shared write locks if and only if lock was acquired immediately without wait loop. In presence of concurrent exclusive session they were incorrectly promoted to write locks after release of that concurrent exclusive lock. Now they are never included into that map, there are no reasons to do it (but they still wait for release of concurrent exclusive lock, of course).StringUtils.join()is removed and replaced withString.join().=syntax inORDER BYis not accepted by the parser any more.? = CALLsyntax is now parsed directly without additional switch over types of tokens.Parser.parseSelectExpressions()now changescurrentSelectonly when necessary.