Conversation
|
Thank you for your pull request. Before we can look at your contribution, we need to ensure all contributors are covered by a Contributor License Agreement. After the following items are addressed, please respond with a new comment here, and the automated system will re-verify.
Regards, |
|
It is useful to provide link to the last update #19182 - most changes should be of the same nature. |
jtattermusch
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is mostly looking good (with exception of my comment). Let's see what the tests say.
| s.platform = Gem::Platform::RUBY | ||
|
|
||
| s.add_dependency 'google-protobuf', '~> 3.8' | ||
| s.add_dependency 'google-protobuf', '~> 3.9.0' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think the missing .0 is intended. (see PR for bump to 3.8). Please fix in the .template file
|
@TeBoring for some reason the CLA check is failing - can you doublecheck please? |
|
What do I need to do for the CLA? Can we sign the cla for the foundation?
…On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 07:36 Jan Tattermusch ***@***.***> wrote:
@TeBoring <https://github.com/TeBoring> for some reason the CLA check is
failing - can you doublecheck please?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#19630?email_source=notifications&email_token=ABHUPZP2RJMNA36D6KJCUBDP74VAFA5CNFSM4ICNRII2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD2ENBSI#issuecomment-512282825>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABHUPZO3C5I2HTLB5XYQB2LP74VAFANCNFSM4ICNRIIQ>
.
|
|
CLA: https://identity.linuxfoundation.org/projects/cncf you should be able to sign as google employee. |
|
The c# error is something we need to take a look into. It might also be that 3.9.0 might contain a breaking change that needs to be rolled back. |
|
The C# problem likely has to do with this change: |
|
CC @ObsidianMinor (probably related to protocolbuffers/protobuf#5350) |
|
I signed |
|
3.9.0 was delisted until a 3.9.1 release can be made to with these changes. The C# issues are probably related to that. |
|
Looks like the test is using new protoc but old c# runtime? @jtattermusch is the failure in this case, and why old c# runtime is used in Grpc's test? Protobuf only gurantee old generated code work with new runtime. Not gurantee new generated code work with old runtime |
|
Ok, I think I now understand what happened:
I created #19679 to fix the problem. After it's merged, this PR needs to be updated to modify |
|
Superseded by #19867 |
No description provided.