Skip to content

cmake: choose the right protoc executable with gRPC_PROTOBUF_PROVIDER=package#12411

Merged
jtattermusch merged 2 commits intogrpc:masterfrom
jtattermusch:cmake_protoc_target_file
Sep 11, 2017
Merged

cmake: choose the right protoc executable with gRPC_PROTOBUF_PROVIDER=package#12411
jtattermusch merged 2 commits intogrpc:masterfrom
jtattermusch:cmake_protoc_target_file

Conversation

@jtattermusch
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

  • also move cmake config files from tools/cmake to cmake directory

Fixes #12230

Supersedes PRs #11891 and #11794.

@jtattermusch
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

CC @kskalski @hesmar this should solve the issues pointed out in your PRs and I feel this way is more readable. Sorry for the delay, it took me a while to come up with this PR as it was originally part of a larger effort to improve our CMakeFile.txt and add some tests to continue it keeps working well.

The first prerequisite is to finish up #12305 and get it merged (and I have some followup changes on top of it).

@grpc-kokoro
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

[microbenchmarks] No significant performance differences

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mehrdada mehrdada left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@grpc-kokoro
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

[trickle] No significant performance differences

@grpc-kokoro
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

[microbenchmarks] No significant performance differences

@jtattermusch jtattermusch force-pushed the cmake_protoc_target_file branch from f5624b9 to 9d1d052 Compare September 10, 2017 12:04
@grpc-kokoro
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

[trickle] No significant performance differences

@grpc-kokoro
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

[microbenchmarks] No significant performance differences

@jtattermusch
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@BusyJay
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

BusyJay commented Sep 14, 2017

Will v1.6.1 contain this changes?

@jtattermusch
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@BusyJay most likely not, it's going to be in v1.7.0

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 22, 2019
@lock lock bot unassigned mehrdada Jan 22, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants