Skip to content

Fixed unclear wording in the validation section#1096

Merged
leebyron merged 3 commits intographql:mainfrom
PascalSenn:pse/fixed-unclear-wording-in-validation
Jul 1, 2025
Merged

Fixed unclear wording in the validation section#1096
leebyron merged 3 commits intographql:mainfrom
PascalSenn:pse/fixed-unclear-wording-in-validation

Conversation

@PascalSenn
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The start of the sentence (For this section of this schema,) does currently not really make sense.

@netlify
Copy link
Copy Markdown

netlify Bot commented May 23, 2024

Deploy Preview for graphql-spec-draft ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 47a3ec7
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/graphql-spec-draft/deploys/6863608ae37d980008de9e4e
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1096--graphql-spec-draft.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@benjie benjie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, looks like a typo and it was intended to be "For this section of this specification, we will assume...". I like the shorter wording you propose though 👍

@graphql/tsc If you agree this is a typo please add another approval and merge.

Comment thread spec/Section 5 -- Validation.md Outdated
@benjie benjie added the ✏️ Editorial PR is non-normative or does not influence implementation label May 23, 2024
@leebyron leebyron merged commit e71805e into graphql:main Jul 1, 2025
7 of 8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

✏️ Editorial PR is non-normative or does not influence implementation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants