Skip to content

Composite types is not clearly defined #1076

@andimarek

Description

@andimarek

The spec uses the word "composite" 5 times, but it is never clearly defined.

While it is quite clear that composite for output types means Interface, Object or Union the usage for input types is in my experience much less common. The only input composite type is Input Object and the spec uses it in this way too.

We should clearly define the meaning of composite type.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions