With the publication of 0.9.0 which includes #600, postgraphql broke. Postgraphql implemented __id in advance in order to support the customers use case, there is a pending request open here that refers to the validity of it (even though it is not yet implemented). Might it be good to add an exception case if __ is used for __id: GraphQLID in order to not-break that case?
With the publication of 0.9.0 which includes #600,
postgraphqlbroke. Postgraphql implemented__idin advance in order to support the customers use case, there is a pending request open here that refers to the validity of it (even though it is not yet implemented). Might it be good to add an exception case if__is used for__id: GraphQLIDin order to not-break that case?