-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 542
Salesforce release type does not allow monorepo #1856
Copy link
Copy link
Closed
Labels
help wantedWe'd love to have community involvement on this issue.We'd love to have community involvement on this issue.needs designNeeds some thought into how this would workNeeds some thought into how this would workpriority: p3Desirable enhancement or fix. May not be included in next release.Desirable enhancement or fix. May not be included in next release.type: bugError or flaw in code with unintended results or allowing sub-optimal usage patterns.Error or flaw in code with unintended results or allowing sub-optimal usage patterns.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
help wantedWe'd love to have community involvement on this issue.We'd love to have community involvement on this issue.needs designNeeds some thought into how this would workNeeds some thought into how this would workpriority: p3Desirable enhancement or fix. May not be included in next release.Desirable enhancement or fix. May not be included in next release.type: bugError or flaw in code with unintended results or allowing sub-optimal usage patterns.Error or flaw in code with unintended results or allowing sub-optimal usage patterns.
Environment details
release-pleaseversion: 15.7.0Steps to reproduce
MissingRequiredFileError: salesforce (dschach/campaign-member-status): Missing required file: force-app/sfdx-project.json
But a given SFDX project should have only ONE sfdx-project.json file, with a separate packageDirectories object for each package or metadata grouping.
For an example, see my repo with three metadata directories (force-app, unpackaged, and triggerhandler)
I am concerned that this Salesforce release type has not been tested properly. It already violates rules by putting version numbers in packageDirectories objects that don't have a value for package.
Release Please Manifest
Release Please Config