Product search samples#192
Conversation
|
We found a Contributor License Agreement for you (the sender of this pull request), but were unable to find agreements for all the commit author(s) or Co-authors. If you authored these, maybe you used a different email address in the git commits than was used to sign the CLA (login here to double check)? If these were authored by someone else, then they will need to sign a CLA as well, and confirm that they're okay with these being contributed to Google. |
|
@Beccca @ace-n @jmdobry |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## product-search-samples #192 +/- ##
=====================================================
Coverage 100% 100%
=====================================================
Files 2 2
Lines 83 83
=====================================================
Hits 83 83
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
|
A Googler has manually verified that the CLAs look good. (Googler, please make sure the reason for overriding the CLA status is clearly documented in these comments.) |
| - image: 'node:6' | ||
| user: node | ||
| steps: &unit_tests_steps | ||
| - checkout |
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
We found a Contributor License Agreement for you (the sender of this pull request), but were unable to find agreements for all the commit author(s) or Co-authors. If you authored these, maybe you used a different email address in the git commits than was used to sign the CLA (login here to double check)? If these were authored by someone else, then they will need to sign a CLA as well, and confirm that they're okay with these being contributed to Google. |
|
The PR currently shows 58 Commits & 79 Files Changed, only a few of which are related to Product Search samples I'm not sure what caused this? The Product Search content itself LGTM as far as I can tell, but the diff is disconcerting 😕 |
|
It looks like this is getting merged into the |
|
@becca @JustinBeckwith P.S.: I do not have write access to the repo. |
|
Oh! I didn't notice that this PR isn't being sent to |
|
THERE WE GO! Good catch @JustinBeckwith! |
|
A Googler has manually verified that the CLAs look good. (Googler, please make sure the reason for overriding the CLA status is clearly documented in these comments.) |
|
CLAs look good, thanks! |
|
I'll LGTM pending test pass! |
|
Will be closing this PR , since new one with the rebased code as a direct branch on the master has been created. All review comments here have been resolved as part of #196 |
Product Search (v1p3beta1)
This Pull Request adds the code samples for cloud.google.com documentation for Product Search How-to Guides
Product Search How-to Guides –> vision/product-search/docs/how-to
products.js
productSets.js
–> Products in productSets.js
referenceImages.js
similarProducts.js
importProductSets.js
This last sample has been newly added after looking into the python and Java samples for comparison.
For the canonical versions, please see the Python Product Search Samples in python-docs-samples
These samples are in Beta and require using the v1p3beta1 API endpoint:
Before being ready for review & merge: